PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8490340

Visiting through the night.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the time distribution of visits at night and to evaluate trends in night visits from 1982 to 1992. DESIGN: Analysis of a sample of one in 12 claim forms for night visits submitted over one year beginning 1 July 1991, and estimation of the number of night visits in previous years from data on payment. Further information was obtained from performance indicators from the Department of Health. SETTING: General practices responsible to Berkshire family health services authority. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Times of night visits, proportion performed by deputies, and trend in number of night visits after adjusting for the increased hours during which visits are claimed. RESULTS: The change in the hours for which payment may be claimed accounted for 33.8% (536/1584) of all night visits in the sample. After visits during these extra two hours were excluded, claims increased by 38.7% from 1989 to 1992 and more than doubled in the past 10 years. Use of deputies both in Berkshire and in England and Wales dropped by more than half since 1989. General practitioners in Berkshire claimed 31.5 night visits per 1000 population in 1992. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the number of night visits is only partly due to the change in hours during which visits may be claimed. It is also due to a long term and possibly accelerating rise in demand. This is despite a major reduction in the proportion of calls performed by deputising services, the use of which had been said to be the main factor increasing the numbers of night visits.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Salisbury. 1993-03-20. Visiting through the night.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6880.762

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Health inequalities in Scotland and England: the contrasting journeys of ideas from research into policy.

Both the UK's Labour Government and Scotland's devolved Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition Executive have committed themselves to reducing health inequalities. Furthermore, both institutions have emphasised the importance of using evidence to inform policy responses. In light of such political commitments, a significant amount of work has been undertaken in the field of health inequalities in order to: (i) review the available research evidence; (ii) assess the extent to which policies have been based on this research evidence; and (iii) evaluate the success (or failure) of policies to tackle health inequalities. Yet so far only limited attention has been given to exploring how key actors involved in research-policy dialogues understand the processes involved. In an attempt to address this gap, this article draws on data from semi-structured interviews with 58 key actors in the field of health inequalities research and policymaking in the UK to argue that it is ideas, rather than research evidence, which have travelled from research into policy. The descriptions of the varying journeys of these ideas fit three types--successful, partial and fractured--each of which is outlined with reference to one example. The paper then employs existing theories about research-policy relations and the movement of ideas in an attempt to illuminate and better understand the contrasting journeys. In the concluding discussion, it is argued that the third approach, which focuses on the entrepreneurial processes involved in the marketing of ideas, is most helpful in understanding the research findings, but that this needs to be discussed in relation to the political context within which negotiations take place.

England↗