Cardiac retransplantation: determining limits.

E G Collins; G J Mozdzierz

PubMed · 8491656

Cardiac retransplantation: determining limits.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac transplantation has become an acceptable treatment option for end-stage congestive heart failure. Because of the increasing demand, there are not enough hearts to supply all patients in need of cardiac transplantation. This significant supply and demand imbalance necessitates that rationing decisions be made. This article will explore decisions made surrounding cardiac retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Early statistics suggest that survival for patients undergoing retransplantation is lower than first-time transplant recipients. In addition, the question of justice or fairness arises. Patients who are offered second and third heart transplants may deprive a significant number of patients who have not had their first chance at transplantation. The authors propose, based on medical suitability, respect for autonomy, and the principle of justice, that cardiac transplantation be a one-time treatment option. Retransplantation should not be allowed.

Explore related subjects

Beneficence Contraindications Ethical Theory Ethics, Medical Health Care Rationing Heart Transplantation Humans Patient Selection Personal Autonomy Reoperation Resource Allocation Social Justice Survival Rate Time Factors Analytical Approach Health Care Financing Administration Health Care and Public Health United Network for Organ Sharing Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

E G Collins, G J Mozdzierz. Cardiac retransplantation: determining limits.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8491656/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Towards a Confucian virtue bioethics: reframing Chinese medical ethics in a market economy.

This essay addresses a moral and cultural challenge facing health care in the People's Republic of China: the need to create an understanding of medical professionalism that recognizes the new economic realities of China and that can maintain the integrity of the medical profession. It examines the rich Confucian resources for bioethics and health care policy by focusing on the Confucian tradition's account of how virtue and human flourishing are compatible with the pursuit of profit. It offers the Confucian account of the division of labor and the financial inequalities this produces with special attention to China's socialist project of creating the profession of barefoot doctors as egalitarian peasant physicians and why this project failed. It then further develops the Confucian acknowledgement of the unequal value of different services and products and how this conflicts with the current system of payment to physicians which has led to the corruption of medical professionalism through illegal supplementary payments. It further gives an account the oblique intentionality of Confucian moral psychology that shows how virtuous persons can pursue benevolent actions while both foreseeing profit and avoiding defining their character by greed. This account of Confucian virtue offers the basis for a medical professionalism that can function morally within a robustly profit-oriented market economy. The paper concludes with a summary of the characteristics of Confucian medical professionalism and of how it places the profit motive within its account of virtue ethics.

Beneficence↗

PubMed2006

How to combine hermeneutics and Wide Reflective Equilibrium?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Beneficence↗

PubMed2006

Using empirical research to formulate normative ethical principles in biomedicine.

Bioethical research has tended to focus on theoretical discussion of the principles on which the analysis of ethical issues in biomedicine should be based. But this discussion often seems remote from biomedical practice where researchers and physicians confront ethical problems. On the other hand, published empirical research on the ethical reasoning of health care professionals offer only descriptions of how physicians and nurses actually reason ethically. The question remains whether these descriptions have any normative implications for nurses and physicians? In this article, we illustrate an approach that integrates empirical research into the formulation of normative ethical principles using the moral-philosophical method of Wide Reflective Equilibrium (WRE). The research method discussed in this article was developed in connection with the project 'Bioethics in Theory and Practice'. The purpose of this project is to investigate ethical reasoning in biomedical practice in Denmark empirically. In this article, we take the research method as our point of departure, but we exclusively discuss the theoretical framework of the method, not its empirical results. We argue that the descriptive phenomenological hermeneutical method developed by Lindseth and Norberg (2004) and Pedersen (1999) can be combined with the theory of WRE to arrive at a decision procedure and thus a foundation for the formulation of normative ethical principles. This could provide health care professionals and biomedical researchers with normative principles about how to analyse, reason and act in ethically difficult situations in their practice. We also show how to use existing bioethical principles as inspiration for interpreting the empirical findings of qualitative studies. This may help researchers design their own empirical studies in the field of ethics.

Beneficence↗