PubMed · 8496130
The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised Version (DISC-R): III. Concurrent criterion validity.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the concurrent criterion validity of the Revised Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-R), a structured lay-administered instrument designed for use in community studies, under conditions designed to provide strict controls for information and method variance. METHOD: The DISC-R was compared with a semistructured clinical interview that covered a similar information base as the DISC-R, used standardized ratings to record symptom information, and, similar to the DISC-R, was scored by DSM-III-R-based computerized diagnostic algorithms. Subjects were 74 child and adolescent clinic attendees and their adult custodians. RESULTS: Overall, moderate levels of agreement were found between DISC-R and clinician-generated diagnoses; these findings were tempered, however, by the fact that the validation interview was less reliable than the DISC-R. CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings provide preliminary support for the use of the DISC-R, they cast some doubt on the adequacy of clinician-generated diagnoses as validation criteria and suggest that alternate approaches to the assessment of validation should be pursued.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Piacentini, D Shaffer, P Fisher, M Schwab-Stone, M Davies, P Gioia. 1993. The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised Version (DISC-R): III. Concurrent criterion validity.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199305000-00025
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.