PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8506514

Instrumentation for spirometry.

Abstract

In addition to improvements in spirometry instrumentation, the availability and quality of mechanical pump-testing equipment have also improved. These devices have largely relied on the ATS 24 standard waveforms and appear to simulate human FVC maneuvers reasonably well, at least with respect to testing using room air. Testing using mechanical pumps filled with heated and humidified air to better simulate the human FVC maneuver is still evolving. With the availability of these testing devices, many problems in both spirometric hardware and software can be identified and corrected. Perhaps the two most significant emerging advancements in spirometry instrumentation are the automated test acceptability and reproducibility assessments with immediate feedback to the technician and the development of small portable spirometers. At least two major studies (LHS8 and NHANES12) have described a second generation of comprehensive on-line assessment of test quality with immediate feedback to the spirometry technician. The use of quality assessment software appears to significantly improve the quality of the spirometry data through feedback to technicians. Spirometry hardware is also advancing as several hand-held devices are being developed to measure not only peak flow but also FEV1, FVC, and other parameters. These battery-powered portable spirometers will continue to decrease in size and cost and may eventually displace the hand-held peak flow meters in current use.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Hankinson. Instrumentation for spirometry.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8506514/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A computer program for assessing interexaminer agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject.

This report describes a computer program for applying a new statistical method for determining levels of agreement, or reliability, when multiple examiners evaluate a single subject. The statistics that are performed include the following: an overall level of agreement, expressed as a percentage, that takes into account all possible levels of partial agreement; the same statistical approach for deriving a separate level of agreement of every examiner with every other examiner; and tests of the extent to which a giver examiner's rating (say a symptom score of three on a five-category ordinal rating scale) deviates from the group or overall average rating. These deviation scores are interpreted as standard Z statistics. Finally, both statistical and clinical criteria are provided to evaluate levels of interexaminer agreement.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted

A new method for assessing interexaminer agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject: applications to the assessment of neuropsychiatric symtomatology.

A new method is introduced for assessing levels of interexaminer agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject, with an application in psychiatric research. It is designed to provide an overall level of interexaminer agreement and separate indices of agreement for each examiner. These indices are based on biostatistical and clinical criteria to determine whether the ratings of any given examiner are appreciably higher or lower than the group average, or a consensus diagnosis. A number of examples, from ongoing psychiatric research, are provided to illustrate conditions favoring the application of the new methodology. Finally, the necessary software for performing the analyses is available to clinical investigators with interest in this area of assessment.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted