PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8508708

DNA-DNA hybridization demonstrates apparent genetic differences between Helicobacter pylori from patients with duodenal ulcer and asymptomatic gastritis.

Abstract

We asked whether different clinical outcomes of Helicobacter pylori infection might be a reflection of genetic differences in infecting organisms. Using DNA-DNA hybridization we examined whether hybridization levels grouped H. pylori isolates corresponding to the type of disease (gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, asymptomatic gastritis) from which they were recovered. Target DNAs were prepared from H. pylori strains cultured from gastric biopsy specimens of 25 patients; 5 with gastric ulcers, 9 with duodenal ulcers, and 11 from asymptomatic volunteers endoscopically proven not to have peptic ulcer disease. DNA-DNA hybridization was performed with whole genomic probes made from an isolate from each of the three disease categories. Using a DNA probe from an isolate from a duodenal ulcer patient, we found that isolates from patients with duodenal ulcer and nonulcer gastritis yielded significant differences in levels of hybridization. The levels of hybridization of DNA from H. pylori isolates from duodenal ulcer patients, gastric ulcer patients, and nonulcer gastritis controls were 85.5% +/- 7%, 83% +/- 3%, and 78.3% +/- 5%, respectively (mean +/- SD), and the difference between the hybridization levels obtained with duodenal ulcer and nonulcer control target DNAs was statistically significant (P = 0.025). These data suggest that the outcome of infection (eg, ulcer or no ulcer) may be due to virulence factors encoded by genomic DNA. If such differences exist, it should be possible to produce probes that would identify the ulcer virulence gene(s) and clearly distinguish between ulcerogenic and nonulcerogenic strains of H. pylori.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H H Yoshimura, D G Evans, D Y Graham. 1993. DNA-DNA hybridization demonstrates apparent genetic differences between Helicobacter pylori from patients with duodenal ulcer and asymptomatic gastritis.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01295731

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of GenoType MTBC with RFLP-PCR and multiplex PCR to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex species.

The aims of the work presented here were to evaluate a commercial system based on DNA hybridization technology on nitrocellulose strips (GenoType MTBC; Hain Diagnostika, Nehren, Germany) for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates to the species level and to compare the results with those obtained using the RFLP-PCR and multiplex PCR molecular techniques, biochemical tests and susceptibility testing. The commercial system correctly identified 102 of 103 (99.03%) strains studied, indicating it is capable of discriminating among the tuberculosis complex species.

DNA Probes↗

Microarray-in-a-tube for detection of multiple viruses.

BACKGROUND: The detection of multiple viruses is important for pathogenic diagnosis and disease control. Microarray detection is a good method, but requires complex procedures for multiple virus detection. METHODS: We developed a novel PCR assay, the microarray-in-a-tube system, which integrates multiple PCR processes and DNA microarrays for multiple virus detection. A 5 x 5 oligonucleotide microarray for detecting 4 respiratory tract viruses (severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus, influenza A virus, influenza B virus, and enterovirus) with inner controls was arranged on the inner surface of a specially designed Eppendorf cap with a flat, optically transparent window. RESULTS: We were able to perform all detection processes in the encapsulated system without opening the cap. The 4 viruses were successfully amplified by one-step reverse transcription-PCR in the encapsulated tube. After the PCR process, the microarray-in-a-tube was inverted, and the fluorescence-labeled PCR products were directly hybridized on the microarray. Hybridization signals were obtained with an ordinary fluorescent microscope. The sensitivity of the system for virus detection reached 10(2) copies/microL. With the help of inner controls, the system provided reliable results without false negatives and false positives. CONCLUSIONS: The microarray-in-a-tube system is a rapid, labor-saving tool for multiple virus detection with several advantages, such as convenience, prevention of cross-contamination of the PCR products, and potential for multiple-gene detection.

DNA Probes↗