PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8518195

Embryonic induction.

Abstract

The current understanding of the mechanism of embryonic induction is reviewed. The embryological data which are necessary to establish the existence of an inductive process are described and the criteria for the identification of inducing factors are discussed. These criteria comprise: a demonstration that the factor has the appropriate biological activity, that it is expressed in biologically available form at the correct time and place in the embryo, and that when it is inhibited in vivo, the interaction should fail. Current understanding of the molecular basis of competence and threshold responses is discussed. Four case studies are examined in further detail: the dorsoventral patterning in Drosophila is controlled by a gradient of the decapentaplegic gene product, a member of the TGF beta superfamily. Mesoderm induction in Xenopus embryos is thought to be controlled by several factors acting in concert: activins, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), Wnt proteins and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). The formation of the kidney in higher vertebrates involves a permissive interaction and some molecules are known to be necessary for the process but the identity of the primary inducing signal remains elusive. The anteroposterior pattern in the chick limb is controlled by a morphogen gradient emitted by the zone of polarising activity (ZPA). Although closely mimicked by retinoic acid (RA), this substance is probably not itself the morphogen. In general, the technical advances of recent years have enabled dramatic progress to be made in understanding the molecular basis of embryonic induction. Although much remains to be done, the methods of investigation are now well established.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Slack. 1993. Embryonic induction.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4773(93)90040-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Activin A programs the differentiation of human TFH cells.

Follicular helper T cells (TFH cells) are CD4(+) T cells specialized in helping B cells and are associated both with protective antibody responses and autoimmune diseases. The promise of targeting TFH cells therapeutically has been limited by fragmentary understanding of extrinsic signals that regulate the differentiation of human TFH cells. A screen of a human protein library identified activin A as a potent regulator of TFH cell differentiation. Activin A orchestrated the expression of multiple genes associated with the TFH program, independently or in concert with additional signals. TFH cell programming by activin A was antagonized by the cytokine IL-2. Activin A's ability to drive TFH cell differentiation in vitro was conserved in non-human primates but not in mice. Finally, activin-A-induced TFH programming was dependent on signaling via SMAD2 and SMAD3 and was blocked by pharmacological inhibitors.

Activins

Short-range signaling by candidate morphogens of the TGF beta family and evidence for a relay mechanism of induction.

The specification and patterning of cell fates by a morphogen gradient is a unifying theme of developmental biology, yet little evidence exists for the presence of gradients in vivo or to show how such putative gradients form. Vg1 and activin are candidate morphogens involved in Xenopus mesoderm induction. This study suggests that these TGF beta family members act on adjacent cells but do not travel through the intact extracellular space to induce distant cells directly. Moreover, we present evidence for the presence of secondary inducing signals that could be involved in relaying signals to distant cells. These results suggest that if a localized cellular source of an inducer acts to pattern mesodermal cells at a distance in Xenopus embryos, it does so by a relay mechanism.

Activins

An experimental system for analyzing response to a morphogen gradient.

A recently described experimental system for analyzing the mode of action of a morphogen gradient involves the in situ hybridization of sectioned tissue constructs. In these constructs, a source of activin signaling induces the transcription of several mesodermal genes in blastula animal caps, according to the position of cells in a concentration gradient. New experiments show that activin-loaded beads emit a signal for only 2 hr and that the same cell can be induced to express different genes. We determine the position in the gradient and the time after the start of activin signaling at which early genes, including Mix1, Xpo, Xwnt8, Xchd, and Xlim1, are activated, relative to the previously tested genes Xbra and Xgsc.

Activins