PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8518546

A portable datalogger to evaluate recall-based time-use measures.

Abstract

Self-completed recall diaries have become a common tool in epidemiology and exposure assessment to determine the location and/or activities of subjects during study periods. Unfortunately, little effort has been made to determine the accuracy of such an approach for providing information without significant bias. It is usually assumed that subjects are truthful and complete in their recall. An electronic datalogger has been designed to allow subjects to record location changes as they occur in real time. Subjects carried the datalogger for 3-5 days and completed recall diaries at the end of each day. The concordance between the two records was found to be relatively good for the most commonly visited locations, e.g., bed/bath, workplace, etc. Poorer agreement was found for locations of short or infrequent visits, e.g., cellar or vehicle. The merits and shortcomings of the datalogger approach are discussed. While having external validation for recall diary records is clearly necessary, reliance on subject input to the datalogger presents its own problems related to subject compliance. Electronic approaches which do not require active subject input are recommended to aid in the evaluation of recall diaries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Waldman, S M Bilder, N C Freeman, M Friedman. A portable datalogger to evaluate recall-based time-use measures.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8518546/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗