Prescriptive authority for advanced practice nurses: current and future perspectives.

K C McDermott

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8524675

Prescriptive authority for advanced practice nurses: current and future perspectives.

K C McDermott

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present an overview of the issues related to prescriptive authority and advanced practice nurses (APNs) in oncology. DATA SOURCES: Professional journals and books, print media, and professional and government releases. DATA SYNTHESIS: Discussion of issues related to complex political, educational, economic, and healthcare environmental factors. Strategies to achieve increased recognition for APN prescriptive authority include increasing APNs' knowledge about the effects of the political process on prescriptive authority, educating legislators and consumers, promoting standardization of pharmacology curricula, and encouraging formation of coalitions. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to pass a national healthcare plan, escalating managed-care markets, and the reform efforts of individual states to forge their own healthcare initiatives will challenge the APN's ability to practice and prescribe. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The subject of prescriptive authority highlights the controversies and debates that APNs encounter in a dynamic healthcare environment. These include the complexity of state-to-state regulations, non-nursing professions making key decisions regarding scope of practice and prescriptive authority, and the challenge for APNs to carve out new roles while overcoming state regulatory inconsistencies and market-reform barriers. If not resolved, these issues will continue to prevent qualified APNs from providing appropriate and comprehensive care to patients with cancer.

Explore related subjects

Drug Prescriptions Health Care Reform Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Lobbying Nurse Clinicians Nurse Practitioners Politics Professional Autonomy United States Consensus Statement Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

K C McDermott. 1995. Prescriptive authority for advanced practice nurses: current and future perspectives.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8524675/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1996

Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in fundholding and non-fundholding general practices: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the variation in prescribing among general practices by examining the contribution to this variation of fundholding, training status, partnership status, and the level of deprivation in the practice population and to investigate the extent to which fundholding has been responsible for any changes in prescribing. DESIGN: Analysis of prescribing data (PACT) for the years 1990-1 (before fundholding) and 1993-4 (after fundholding), Use of multiple linear regressions to investigate the variation among practices in total prescribing costs (net ingredient cost per prescribing units), and mean cost per item in each of the two years and also the change in these variables between years. SETTING: Former Mersey region. SUBJECTS: 384 practices. RESULTS: The models developed explained the variation in cost per item (43% of variation explained for 1990-1, 38% for 1993-4) and prescribing volume (34% for 1990-1, 38% for 1993-4) better than the variation in total prescribing costs (3% for 1990-1, 7% for 1993-4). The models developed to explain the change in these variables between years did not explain more than 10% of the variation. Most of the explained variation in the change in total prescribing costs was accounted for by fundholding. Of the pounds 3.71 saved by first wave fundholders compared with non-fundholders pounds 3.57 was attributable to fundholding alone. CONCLUSION: In neither year did fundholding make a major contribution to the variation in prescribing behaviour among practices, which was better explained by deprivation, training status, and partnership status, but it did seem largely responsible for differences in the rise of total prescribing costs between fundholders and non fundholders.

Drug Prescriptions↗

PubMed1996

[The prescription as an aid for communication between physicians and pharmacists. A study of errors and insufficient information on prescriptions].

Traditionally the pharmacist and the physician have played separate roles in the delivery of prescription drugs to patients. One reason for this is the potential for errors during this complex process. The prescription is the key instrument in the communication between the two professions. By screening a large number of prescriptions we found several errors involving potential harm to the patient. We also found that the prescription often contains insufficient information, thereby making it difficult for the pharmacist to evaluate the medication. Quality assurance is of vital importance in both the prescribing and the dispensing process. Professional cooperation between pharmacist and physician should combine the unique knowledge of both professions and thereby achieve optimal drug therapy for the patient.

Drug Prescriptions↗

PubMed1996

Role of community pharmacies in relation to HIV prevention and drug misuse: findings from the 1995 national survey in England and Wales.

OBJECTIVES: To establish activity levels of community (high street) pharmacies in the provision of HIV prevention services to drug misusers and to compare these findings with the levels identified in 1988. DESIGN: Self completion questionnaire (four mailings) to a random 1 in 4 sample of all community pharmacies, stratified by family health services authority. SETTING: England and Wales. SUBJECTS: Data provided by pharmacist in charge of the dispensary, on service provision at the pharmacy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative reports of current activity levels for (a) dispensing of controlled drugs to drug misusers, (b) sale of needles and syringes, (c) needle and syringe exchange. RESULTS: 74.8% response rate (1984/2654). In 1995, 50.1% (992/1980) of pharmacies were dispensing controlled drugs (mostly methadone), compared with 23.0% (562/2457) in 1988; 34.5% (677/1962) of pharmacies were selling injecting equipment, compared with 28.0% (676/2434) in 1988; 18.9% (366/1937) were providing a needle exchange service, compared with 3.0% (65/2415) in 1988. CONCLUSION: Activity levels increased substantially across all three service areas. Increased activity included greater individual activity as well as higher proportions of pharmacies participating. The network of community pharmacies represents an underused point of contact for this Health of the Nation target population.

Drug Prescriptions↗