PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8528544

Continuous quality improvement in a day ward.

Abstract

The increasing usage of short-stay facilities within Australia has focused attention upon the efficiency of surgical day wards. Although the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) is actively promoting the development of clinical indicators for same-day facilities, there is a concern that these measurements relate to efficiency rather than to humanitarian aspects of the quality of service. We have established a programme of continuous quality improvement (CQI) in a surgical day ward with the nursing and clerical staff being empowered as core members of the team. Reviews and audits have identified a number of targets for our activity. Some issues have been resolved very easily (ward clerks telephoning patients to confirm admissions the next day) but the solution to some other problems has required lengthy negotiations between various groups (the construction of clearly written pre-admission guidelines for patients). Activities aimed at improving the service provided to patients attending surgical day wards must extend beyond the mere collection of information about clinical indicators.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Senior, G Elliott-Boutle, G Bergin, L Addicoat, J C Hall. 1995. Continuous quality improvement in a day ward.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8528544/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗