PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8528832

An iconoclastic perspective on progress in pharmacy practice.

Abstract

Progress in pharmacy practice is examined and areas for improvement are identified. Data from surveys of hospital and health system pharmacy practice from 1957 to 1994 show that the steady progress from 1974 to 1985 was not sustained over the past decade. Changing to a profession in which all practitioners provide pharmaceutical care will be difficult when practice in hospitals, where the most acutely ill patients are treated, does not meet the profession's recommended standards. Many pharmacists may be resigned to a reality in which their services are viewed as ancillary. The number of medication misadventures that occur indicates that there is an unmet need for effective medication management. Pharmaceutical care offers the promise of better patient outcomes as well as "reprofessionalization" of pharmacists. To elevate the level of pharmacy practice, individual practitioners need will; too much attention has been given to skill. Many new practitioners have earned Pharm. D. degrees but not received enough nurturing from colleagues to develop into innovators who will continue the profession's progress. It is crucial that the pharmacy practice and education communities cooperate to prepare pharmacists to function in the changing health care system. Also, professional organizations must set aside their fragmented interests and focus together on pharmacists' survival. The restructuring and economic pressures in health care may offer pharmacists the opportunity for progress, since improving drug use would help to decrease health problems and cost.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P G Pierpaoli. 1995-08-15. An iconoclastic perspective on progress in pharmacy practice.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp%2F52.16.1763

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prizes to solve problems in and beyond medicine, big and small: it can work.

This article complements Dr. Charlton's follow-up of David Horrobin's suggestion in Nature two decades ago to offer sizeable prizes for practical approaches to either eliminate a problem in medicine or reduce the cost of its solution. Examples from the 20th and 21st centuries illustrate that prizes--small and big--have generated sustained and successful attacks on defined problems in biology, physics and, lately, mathematics. Provided that glittering prizes are offered and awarded with care, they can lead to effective problem-solving in medicine and related biomedical sciences as well.

Awards and Prizes↗