PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8528866

Immunotherapy in multiple sclerosis, Part 1.

Abstract

The efficacies of corticosteroids and azathioprine (part 1) and of cyclophosphamide, immune globulin, cyclosporine, interferons, copolymer 1, and cladribine (part 2) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are reviewed. MS is an inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the CNS that commonly affects young adults. The involvement of various immune mechanisms in MS suggests a role for immunomodulating therapy. The goals of immunotherapy vary with the clinical stage of the disease and include (1) improving recovery from exacerbations, (2) decreasing the number or severity of relapses, (3) preventing the development of chronic progressive disease from a relapsing-remitting course, and (4) decreasing further progression in patients with chronic progressive disease. In clinical trials, corticotropin and corticosteroids have been found to accelerate recovery from exacerbations. Tapering is often effective after high-dose induction therapy. Long-term maintenance regimens do not alter disease progression and are not recommended. Azathioprine produces modest benefits with respect to relapse rates and disease progression after two or more years of treatment; adverse effects are mild to moderate. Azathioprine should not be used in patients with aggressive disease who may approach severe disability in 6-18 months. Cyclophosphamide, because of its modest impact on disease progression and its potentially severe adverse effects, including cancer, should be reserved for patients with aggressive relapsing-remitting or chronic progressive disease in whom other treatments have failed to work; maintenance therapy is necessary after induction. Intravenous immune globulin may benefit patients with severe relapses; however, its efficacy remains unproven. Cyclosporine also cannot be recommended because of its modest efficacy, marked adverse effects, and high cost. Interferon beta-1b is a more specific immunotherapy that has been found to decrease the number and severity of relapses. This treatment should be considered in patients with relapsing-remitting disease who are having two or more exacerbations per year. Copolymer 1 and cladribine have shown some promising early results. Although various immunotherapeutic drugs can provide relief in patients with MS, none is capable of reversing disease progression, and some can cause serious adverse effects. Better understanding of the immunologic basis of MS may lead to more specific immunotherapies with more lasting benefits.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C C Becker, B E Gidal, J O Fleming. 1995-09-15. Immunotherapy in multiple sclerosis, Part 1.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp%2F52.18.1985

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rituximab for treatment of opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome in neuroblastoma.

Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome that occurs in 2%-3% of patients with neuroblastoma. The cause of this syndrome is believed to be immune mediated, but the exact mechanism still remains unclear. There is an urgent need to improve our current strategies for treating patients with OMS, as many patients have significant long-term neurologic deficits and behavior disorders with current treatment approaches. Therapies that have shown to improve symptoms in these patients have ranged from ACTH and corticosteroids, to intravenous gammaglobulin and plasmapheresis. We report our experience with Rituximab in a patient with neuroblastoma and OMS.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Cyclosporine sparing with mycophenolate mofetil, daclizumab and corticosteroids in renal allograft recipients: the CAESAR Study.

Although the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus are highly effective immunosuppressants, they are associated with serious side effects. There is great interest in immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduction or elimination of CNIs, while maintaining adequate immunosuppression and acceptable acute rejection rates. Patients (n = 536) receiving their first renal allograft were randomized to one of three immunosuppressant regimens: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids (CS) and low-dose CsA (target trough levels of 50-100 ng/mL), weaned from month 4 and withdrawn by month 6; daclizumab, MMF, CS and low-dose CsA; or MMF, CS and standard-dose CsA. Mean GFR 12 months after transplantation (primary end point) was not statistically different in the CsA withdrawal and low-dose CsA groups (both 50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) vs. the standard-dose CsA group (48.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). At 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in the CsA withdrawal group (38%) vs. the low- or standard-dose CsA groups (25.4% and 27.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). In summary, a regimen of continuous low-dose CsA with MMF, CS and daclizumab induction is a clinically safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplant recipients.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗