PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8536952

Simulation study comparing interval estimates for the recombination fraction.

Abstract

Three interval estimation procedures were evaluated to determine the method which provides the most accurate estimates for the recombination fraction, 0. The lod-0.83 support interval, the jackknife confidence interval, and the confidence interval based on estimated asymptotic standard error were compared by calculating the coverage probabilities of each. Family data that were simulated under the model of a single fully penetrant, dominant disease locus at some distance, 0, from fully informative matings were used. Comparisons were based on 1,000 random samples of size 20,60, and 100 families. In addition, a methodology for obtaining prediction intervals for 0 was developed. This procedure is of practical use and does not require asymptotic assumptions based on large sample theory. The results provide an a priori idea about precision of the estimates, as well as empirical interval estimates of 0. Graphs of the authors' Monte Carlo intervals are presented for these simulations. Investigators studying different traits, however, could condition specifically on the family structure and distribution of the disease they are investigating and obtain similar graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B B Nemesure, D A Greenberg, N R Mendell. 1995. Simulation study comparing interval estimates for the recombination fraction.. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.1370120403

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Appropriateness of primary total hip and knee replacements in regions of Ontario with high and low utilization rates.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the appropriateness of case selection for primary hip and knee replacements between two regions in Ontario: one with a high population-based utilization rate and one with a low rate. DESIGN: Random audit of medical records sampled from hospital discharge abstracts, with subsequent implicit and explicit criteria-based assessments of the appropriateness of surgery. STUDY POPULATION: People aged 60 years or over who underwent elective, single-joint, non-fracture-related, primary hip or knee replacement between Apr. 1, 1992, and Mar. 31, 1993, at one of seven hospitals in a high-rate region (comprising Brant, Huron and Oxford countries) or one of eight hospitals in a low-rate region (comprising the cities of Scarborough and Toronto). INTERVENTIONS: Structured review of hospital medical records, with additional review of information from surgeons and family physicians' office charts if necessary. Three physicians reviewed patient data and rated the preoperative pain level and functional status of patients, with agreement among at least two reviewers. The proportion of inappropriate cases was then assessed according to explicit criteria defined by a multidisciplinary panel using the delphi process. Profiles of each case were also subjected to independent implicit review by two rheumatologists and two orthopedic surgeons. OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of joint replacements deemed inappropriate in the high- and low-rate regions according to either the explicit criteria or the implicit review, as well as preoperative pain levels and functional status of patients in the high- and low-rate regions. RESULTS: Hip replacements were more common among patients sampled in the low-rate region than among those in the high-rate region (57.3% v. 39.3%; p < 0.002), although the patients' baseline characteristics, including severity of preoperative pain and dysfunction, were otherwise similar between the regions. Inappropriate surgery, determined by explicit criteria, was equally uncommon in the two regions (6.4% and 6.1%). On implicit review, the two rheumatologists rated fewer cases as appropriate than did the two orthopedic surgeons (63.0% v. 80.0%; p < 0.001); however, the proportion of cases rated as inappropriate by the subspecialists was similar in the high- and low-rate regions (11.4% and 11.0%, respectively, by the rheumatologists, and 6.3% and 10.4%, respectively, by the orthopedic surgeons). CONCLUSIONS: Patients selected for primary hip or knee replacement are similar in the high- and low-rate regions of Ontario. Inappropriate use of this procedure does not account for the high rate of surgery in some areas. Further studies will be required to determine which other factors account for the regional variations in the utilization rates and whether there is underservicing in low-rate areas.

Chi-Square Distribution

[Multiple nosocomial infections. An incidence study].

BACKGROUND: Some studies point out that around 30%-50% of the nosocomial infections (NI) are multiple (MNI) and are found in 21%-30% of the patients with NI. The significance of these data and their potential consequences have led the authors to perform this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A longitudinal descriptive study was carried out on the incidence and characteristics of NI (MNI and single nosocomial infection [SNI]) in 26,977 patients admitted to a county hospital from 1991 to 1993. RESULTS: NI was detected in 1,246 patients with 31% presenting MNI appearing in 15% of the patients. MNI predominated in males, had a mean age were 5 to 12 years higher than the patients with SNI with a mean hospital stay of between 13-28 days more than the SNI group. The MNI were significantly less frequent in the Urology, Gynecology and Obstetrics Departments and were more frequent in the Intensive Care Unit. The localization of the infection varied significantly among the patients with one or several infections. Bacteremia, pneumonia and soft tissue infections were significantly more frequent in MNI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple nosocomial infections are frequent and their basic characteristics are significantly different from those of single nosocomial infections. The patients who acquire SNI should be carefully followed to avoid the appearance of MNI.

Chi-Square Distribution

Dichotomous pattern of coronary atherosclerosis 1 to 9 years after transplantation: insights from systematic intravascular ultrasound imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent and distribution of coronary atherosclerosis after transplantation. BACKGROUND: Transplant coronary artery disease is an important cause of death after cardiac transplantation. Unlike coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound is a sensitive tool for detection and quantitation of this disease. METHODS: We performed intravascular ultrasound imaging in 132 (106 men, 50 +/- 10 years) patients, 1 to 9 years after transplantation using a 30-MHz ultrasound catheter. RESULTS: All three coronary arteries were visualized in 49, two in 62 and one in 21 patients. Of the 1,188 coronary artery segments, 706 were imaged (74% proximal, 64% mid- and 40% distal). At least one site with atherosclerosis (intimal thickness > or = to 0.5 mm) was found in 83% of patients. Atherosclerosis was noted in 64% of proximal, 43% of mid- and 26% of distal segments. Disease was diffuse in 48% and focal in 52%, circumferential in 66% and noncircumferential in 34%. Focal atherosclerosis was more common in proximal (59%) than mid- (48%) and distal segments (27%) (p=0.001). Noncircumferential plaques were more common in the proximal (42%) than mid- (28%) and distal segments (12%) (p=0.001). This pattern of focal and noncircumferential disease proximally, diffuse and circumferential disease distally, was observed irrespective of the time from transplantation. CONCLUSION: Atherosclerosis was detected in more than 80% of patients, with proximal segments most frequently involved. Diffuse and circumferential atherosclerosis was more common in mid- and distal segments. However, focal and noncircumferential involvement was more frequent proximally, a similar pattern to native atherosclerosis. These findings suggest that transplant coronary artery disease has a dual etiology based on the dichotomous pattern of atherosclerosis seen by intravascular ultrasound.

Chi-Square Distribution