[Randomized controlled trials. Recommendations for improving methodology].

Results of the 2002 ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings that pertain to dispensing and administration are presented. A stratified random sample of pharmacy directors at 1101 general and children's medical-surgical hospitals in the United States were surveyed by mail. SMG Marketing Group, Inc., supplied data on hospital characteristics; the survey sample was drawn from SMG's hospital database. The response rate was 46.7%. During 2002, both inpatient and outpatient hours of service increased compared with 2001. Paradoxically, there was an 8.5% decrease in pharmacy staffing and a 7% vacancy rate, suggesting that pharmacists are busier. Most hospitals (80%) had a centralized inpatient dispensing system, but 44% were planning to become more decentralized. Automated dispensing cabinets were used by 58% of hospitals with decentralized drug distribution systems. Most hospitals (81.4%) dispensed more than three quarters of oral doses as unit doses and 63.3% of injectable doses to non-critical care patients, increases from 1999. A large percentage of hospitals (89%) repackaged both oral and injectable medications. More hospitals were repackaging medications than three years ago, primarily because of lack of commercial availability. Approximately 20% of pharmacies either partially or completely outsourced drug preparation activities. Nurses administered medications in virtually all hospitals (99.7%). Despite widespread recommendations to use bar-code technology to check and document doses administered, only 1.5% of hospitals used this technology, an increase from 1.1% in 1999. Nearly two thirds of hospitals used computer-generated medication administration records. While pharmaceutical services are expanding, workforce issues continue to challenge pharmacists trying to maintain and enhance safe medication systems. Safe systems continue to be in place in most hospitals, but the adoption of new technology to improve safety is slow.

Documentation↗

PubMed2003

Nursing documentation time during implementation of an electronic medical record.

OBJECTIVE: To determine, within the context of all nursing duties, the amount of time nurses spend on documentation during the implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) on an intrapartum unit. BACKGROUND: Increased documentation needs during EMR implementation may necessitate increased staffing requirements in an already labor-intensive and demanding environment. METHODS: A work-sampling study was conducted over a 14-day study period, and 18 of 84 (21%) potential 4-hour observation periods were selected. During each period, a single observer made 120 observations and, on locating a specific nurse, immediately recorded that nurse's activity on a standardized and validated instrument. Categories of nursing activities included documentation, bedside care, bedside supportive care, nonbedside care, and nonpatient care. RESULTS: A total of 2160 observations were made. The total percentage of nursing time spent for documentation was 15.8%, 10.6% on paper and 5.2% on the computer. The percentage of time spent on documentation was independently associated with day versus night shifts (19.2% vs 12.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite charting concurrently on both paper and computer, the amount of time spent on documentation was not excessive, and was consistent with previous studies in which neither electronic nor "double charting" occurred.

Documentation↗

PubMed2002

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2001 Presidential Initiative: impact of regulatory burdens on quality cancer care.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2001 Presidential Initiative to assess the administrative burden of payer documentation requirements and their impact on oncology practice. METHODS: The study consisted of a physician questionnaire and an activity log. Site visits were conducted to support survey data. Analysis included 2,493 questionnaires and 1,115 activity logs; data were also collected from site visits to 10 oncology practices. RESULTS: Increased documentation was the greatest concern among respondents, greater even than the stress of dealing with death and dying. More than 97% of survey respondents reported an increase in documentation (averaging 1.4 h/d) and 77% reported an increase in work hours because of documentation in the past 5 years. As a result, more than 40% of respondents reported decreases in key aspects of patient care and decreases in teaching (48%) and research (39%). Site visit data demonstrate similar trends. CONCLUSION: It is critical to find ways to decrease physician burden without decreasing the ability to prevent fraud and abuse. Reforms include provisions in a recently passed bill in the United States House of Representatives to streamline Medicare regulation and increase physician education. To address oncology-specific concerns, changes also should be made to supervision requirements for residents and fellows and evaluation and management documentation for oncology follow-up visits.

Documentation↗