PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8559257

Ethical responsibilities in a managed care system.

D A Krainacker·D Mondragón
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Managed care is becoming increasingly important in health care. A number of ethical questions arise in this system. This paper examines the ethical responsibilities of four players in a managed care system: i) the insurance company; ii) the patient; iii) the primary care provider; and iv) the specialist.

Explore related subjects

Ethics, MedicalManaged Care ProgramsHealth Care and Public HealthJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D A Krainacker, D Mondragón. 1995. Ethical responsibilities in a managed care system.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8559257/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗