PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8561155

Smoking, drinking, and thinking. The Zutphen Elderly Study.

L J Launer·E J Feskens·S Kalmijn·D Kromhout
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The authors examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal relation of smoking habits and current alcohol intake to cognitive status and decline over a 3-year period as well as the extent to which these relations are modified by the presence of clinical conditions indicating atherosclerosis (cardiovascular disease (CVD)/diabetes). Data are from the cohort of men followed in the longitudinal Zutphen Elderly Study in 1990 (n = 489) and 1993 (n = 333). Cognitive function was measured in 1990 and 1993 with the 30-point Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). After adjustment for age, education, and alcohol intake, current smokers made 20% more errors on the MMSE than never smokers in the cross-sectional analyses. Cognitive decline was greatest in those with CVD/diabetes who currently smoked and never smoked (-1.9 and -1.3 points, respectively). After adjustment for age, education, and smoking status, men with CVD/diabetes and low-to-moderate alcohol intake had a significantly lower risk for poor cognitive function (MMSE < or = 25) than abstainers (odds ratios of 0.3 for less than one drink and 0.2 for one to two drinks per day). Alcohol intake was not associated with cognitive decline. These findings do not support the hypothesis of a protective effect of smoking on cognitive function; they suggest that smoking may be harmful among those with CVD/diabetes. Alcohol may result in an acute beneficial effect on cognitive function among those with CVD/diabetes. However, selection bias and unmeasured confounding should be of concern when evaluating these results.

Explore related subjects

Age FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overAlcohol DrinkingCardiovascular DiseasesCognitionCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusEducational StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNetherlandsSmokingThinkingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L J Launer, E J Feskens, S Kalmijn, D Kromhout. 1996-02-01. Smoking, drinking, and thinking. The Zutphen Elderly Study.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008732

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Excess of cancers in Europe: a study of eleven major cancers amenable to lifestyle change.

Worldwide an estimated 11 million cancer cases were diagnosed in 2002, one quarter being in Europe. We estimated the potential in avoidable numbers and proportions of 11 cancers amenable to prevention (cancers of the oral cavity, oesophagus, stomach, colorectal, pancreas, laryngeal, lung, female breast, endometrium, kidney and bladder) in 28 European countries. We assumed that the aggregated rate of 3 countries with lowest incidence to be attainable throughout Europe. The difference between the age- and gender-specific national cancer incidence rates and the lowest rate observed in 2002 was determined and defined as "avoidable." Of the 1.4 million adult cases of selected cancers and countries within our study, 363,000 (59%) cancers in males and 326,000 (45%) cancers in females were hypothetically avoidable. Among men, the proportion was largest in Hungary (77%) and among women, in Belgium (54%). Assuming that differences in cancer incidence are not attributable to genetic susceptibility or diagnostic activity, about 50% of all cases of these 11 cancers could be potentially avoided, especially by decreased smoking among men. Interventions directed at reducing smoking, obesity and alcohol use as well as increasing physical activity and fruit and vegetable intake are necessary to attain lower incidence rates. It is important to recognize that the actual preventable cancer by eliminating currently known risk factors is somewhat less than we have estimated.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2007

Choice of time scale and its effect on significance of predictors in longitudinal studies.

Time-to-event regression is a frequent tool in biomedical research. In clinical trials this time is usually measured from the beginning of the study. The same approach is often adopted in the analysis of longitudinal observational studies. However, in recent years there has appeared literature making a case for the use of the date of birth as a starting point, and thus utilize age as the time-to-event. In this paper, we explore different types of age-scale models and compare them with time-on-study models in terms of the estimated regression coefficients they produce. We consider six proportional hazards regression models that differ in the choice of time scale and in the method of adjusting for the years before the study. By considering the estimating equations of these models as well as numerical simulations we conclude that correct adjustment for the age at entry is crucial in reducing bias of the estimated coefficients. The unadjusted age-scale model is inferior to any of the five other models considered, regardless of their choice of time scale. Additionally, if adjustment for age at entry is made, our analyses show very little to suggest that there exists any practically meaningful difference in the estimated regression coefficients depending on the choice of time scale. These findings are supported by four practical examples from the Framingham Heart Study.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2007

Reproductive risk factors for incident bladder cancer: Iowa Women's Health Study.

We studied the association between reproductive factors and bladder cancer incidence in a prospective cohort study of 37,459 Iowa women aged 55-69 years and initially free from cancer in 1986. Women reported reproductive history and were followed prospectively through 2003. After adjusting for age and smoking, there was an inverse association between age at menopause and incident bladder cancer (n = 192). Compared with menopause at age > or =48, the hazard ratio (HR) of bladder cancer was 1.32 (95% CI; 0.90-1.94) for menopause at 43-47, and 1.60 (95% CI; 1.06-2.39) for < or =42 (p-trend = 0.02). The associations were similar for ages at natural and surgical menopause. In addition, women with a history of bilateral oophorectomy had an increased risk of bladder cancer compared with those who did not undergo bilateral oophorectomy: HR = 1.58 (95% CI; 1.12, 2.22). Finally, there was an indication of a positive association between bladder cancer and shorter lifetime years of ovulation (p-trend = 0.09). There were no associations between incident bladder cancer and age at first birth, number of births, age at menarche, use of hormone replacement therapy or any other reproductive characteristics. This study provides evidence that increased risk of bladder cancer is associated with earlier age at menopause in postmenopausal women.

Age Factors↗