PubMed · 8563017
Coaxial continuous-flow fast-atom bombardment vs electrospray ionization: a sensitivity comparison on a magnetic sector instrument.
Abstract
The performance of an electrospray (ESI) source was evaluated and compared to that of a coaxial continuous-flow fast-atom bombardment source on a magnetic mass spectrometer using ten different peptides over the mass range of 400 to 3500 Da and using a variety of scanning modes. Results show that sensitivities using the two ionization techniques are similar, with limits-of-detection in the attomole to low femtomole range. In addition, proteins can be routinely detected using ESI at femtomole levels. The observance of the noncovalent complex of RNase A and cytidine 2'-monophosphate yields evidence that these complexes can be studied using instruments that operate at high accelerating voltages.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L J Deterding, M Khaledi, K B Tomer. 1996. Coaxial continuous-flow fast-atom bombardment vs electrospray ionization: a sensitivity comparison on a magnetic sector instrument.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0231(19960115)10%3A1%3C60%3A%3Aaid-rcm446%3E3.0.co%3B2-3
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.