PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8567410

A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces.

C D Geisler·C Sang
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A linear (frequency-domain) model of the cat cochlea (implemented in both 1- and 2-dimensional versions) has been developed which uses outer hair cell (OHC) forces in a geometry which includes the longitudinal (base-to-apex) tilt of the outer hair cells (OHCs). When positive (contractile) real OHC force-constants are used, very large (50 + dB) response peaks along with very rapidly accumulating phase lags (which can reach -50 pi radians) are obtained. The wider the longitudinal segmentation, the broader the peaks and the less the phase accumulation; 71-microns segmentation produced the most realistic responses. These large response peaks are achieved by a small zone of negative resistance (ca. 1 mm) just basal to the response peak and the virtual 'zeroing' of the basilar membrane's effective impedance over the entire peak region (ca. 2.5 mm). To produce these peaks, the OHCs generate about 25-times the incoming acoustic power. Inclusion of low-pass filtering in the model's OHC representation produces, by contrast, very unrealistic notch-and-peak displacement complexes accompanied by very large phase lags, for all segmentation widths used. However, when phase reversals of OHC forces are also added, achieved by imbedding a resonant system within the tectorial membrane, very realistic peaks and phase functions are produced. More power must, however, be generated by the OHCs (about 70-times the incoming). The end result is output which mimics quite closely the living basilar membrane's responses to low-intensity high-frequency tones.

Explore related subjects

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsBasilar MembraneBiomechanical PhenomenaCatsCell SizeCochleaComputer SimulationHair Cells, Auditory, OuterModels, BiologicalJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C D Geisler, C Sang. 1995. A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(95)00064-b

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Auditory cortex on the human posterior superior temporal gyrus.

The human superior temporal cortex plays a critical role in hearing, speech, and language, yet its functional organization is poorly understood. Evoked potentials (EPs) to auditory click-train stimulation presented binaurally were recorded chronically from penetrating electrodes implanted in Heschl's gyrus (HG), from pial-surface electrodes placed on the lateral superior temporal gyrus (STG), or from both simultaneously, in awake humans undergoing surgery for medically intractable epilepsy. The distribution of averaged EPs was restricted to a relatively small area on the lateral surface of the posterior STG. In several cases, there were multiple foci of high amplitude EPs lying along this acoustically active portion of STG. EPs recorded simultaneously from HG and STG differed in their sensitivities to general anesthesia and to changes in rate of stimulus presentation. Results indicate that the acoustically active region on the STG is a separate auditory area, functionally distinct from the HG auditory field(s). We refer to this acoustically sensitive area of the STG as the posterior lateral superior temporal area (PLST). Electrical stimulation of HG resulted in short-latency EPs in an area that overlaps PLST, indicating that PLST receives a corticocortical input, either directly or indirectly, from HG. These physiological findings are in accord with anatomic evidence in humans and in nonhuman primates that the superior temporal cortex contains multiple interconnected auditory areas.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2000

Changes to low-frequency components of the TEOAE following acoustic trauma to the base of the cochlea.

Several studies have shown that acoustic trauma to the base of the cochlea can result in loss of transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) energy at frequencies much lower than those affected in the audiogram. We have extended these studies to show that the low-frequency emission energy was substantially affected if the transient stimulus included frequencies within the range affected by the trauma, otherwise the change observed was small. In keeping with the suggestion that TEOAEs are predominantly comprised of intermodulation distortion energy (Yates and Withnell, Hear. Res. 136 (1999) 49-64), trauma to the basal region of the cochlea was found to affect emission energy across a broad frequency range in response to a wide-band acoustic stimulus. Further, group delay measurements demonstrated that the dominant contribution to the TEOAE originated from the basal region of the cochlea.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2000

Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift.

The structural changes associated with noise-induced temporary threshold shift (TTS) were compared to the damage associated with permanent threshold shift (PTS). A within-animal paradigm involving survival-fixation was used to minimize problems with data interpretation from interanimal variability in response to noise. Auditory brainstem response thresholds for clicks and tone pips were determined pre- and 1-2 h post-exposure in 11 chinchillas. The animals were exposed for 24 h to an octave band of noise with a center frequency of 4 kHz and a sound pressure level of 86 dB. Three animals (0/0-day) had both cochleas terminal-fixed 2-3 h post-exposure. Two animals (27/27-day) had threshold shifts determined every other day for 1 week, every week thereafter, and underwent terminal-fixation of both cochleas 27 days after exposure. Six animals (0/n-day) had threshold shifts determined in both ears upon removal from the noise; their left cochlea was then survival-fixed 2-3 h post-exposure. Threshold shifts were determined in their right ear every 2-3 days until their hearing either returned to pre-exposure values or stabilized at a reduced level at which time their right cochlea was terminal-fixed (4-13 days post-exposure). All cochleas were prepared as plastic-embedded flat preparations. Missing hair cells were counted and supporting cells and nerve fibers were evaluated throughout the organ of Corti using phase-contrast microscopy. Post-exposure, all animals had moderate TTSs in their left and right ears which averaged 43 dB for 4-12 kHz. In the 0/0-day animals, the only abnormality which correlated with TTS was a buckling of the pillar bodies. In the 0/n-day animals, their left cochlea (survival-fixed 2-3 h post-exposure) had outer hair cell (OHC) stereocilia which were not embedded in the tectorial membrane in the region of the TTS whereas OHC stereocilia were embedded in the tectorial membrane throughout the cochleas of non-noise-exposed, survival-fixed controls. Three of six right cochleas (terminal-fixed 4-13 days post-exposure) from the 0/n-day animals developed a PTS and two of these cochleas had focal losses of inner and outer hair cells and afferent nerve fibers at the corresponding frequency location. The other cochlea with PTS had buckled pillars in the corresponding frequency region. These results suggest that with moderate levels of noise exposure, buckling of the supporting cells results in an uncoupling of the OHC stereocilia from the tectorial membrane which results in a TTS. The mechanisms resulting in TTS appear to be distinct from those that produce permanent hair cell damage and a PTS.

Acoustic Stimulation↗