PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8577945

The detection level.

Abstract

A statistical measure, the detection level, that conveys information about the risk of type II errors in a way that is easily understandable to the statistically unsophisticated decision maker is proposed. The detection level answers the question: "How big should an effect have been in order to be detected in this way?" Given a statistical test with the critical level (size) alpha*, the detection level of this test is the smallest effect that would, with at least probability 1-alpha*, lead to a significant outcome (P < alpha*) of the test. It is proposed that detection levels should be calculated as a standard procedure in toxicity reviews, and in particular in reports from toxicologists to decision makers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S O Hansson. 1995. The detection level.. https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.1995.1075

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Decision-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus distal splenorenal shunt for portal hypertension.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and surgical distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) are treatments for complications of portal hypertension. TIPS is widely used because it is relatively easy to place. Because TIPS may malfunction over time, it is unclear whether TIPS is superior to DSRS in patients with Child's class A cirrhosis who enjoy a longer survival. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of TIPS to DSRS for portal hypertension in Child's class A cirrhosis. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate the number of procedures, life expectancy, and costs over the first 2 years in patients with Child's class A cirrhosis who underwent a TIPS or DSRS. Patients who received TIPS survived 1.96 years, required 1.7 procedures, and incurred $41,685 in costs. Patients who underwent a DSRS survived 1.86 years, required 1.0 procedure, and incurred $26,951 in costs. The cost-effectiveness of TIPS compared with DSRS was $147,340 per life-year saved. Adjusting the rate of TIPS dysfunction, 1-year survival, or the number of ultrasounds to detect TIPS dysfunction did not change the results. In patients with Child's class A cirrhosis, DSRS is a more cost-effective treatment than TIPS. Until the results of a randomized controlled trial comparing TIPS with DSRS are available, TIPS should be regarded as experimental and prohibitively expensive in Child's class A cirrhosis.

Decision Support Techniques