PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8577970

Quality control for SPECT systems.

Abstract

A comprehensive set of acceptance tests is the basis for an effective quality control program. Acceptance tests indicate whether the scintillation camera meets published specifications but should also include evaluation of certain parameters not specified by the vendor but that can seriously affect image quality. Once a camera is "accepted," initial quality control tests serve as a benchmark for future measurements. Tomographic systems must be subjected to the same basic quality control program as planar cameras. Flood field images must be acquired and evaluated daily; spatial resolution must be tested once each week. Less frequently, parameters such as multiple-window spatial registration, collimator uniformity, system sensitivity, and camera "dead time" should be evaluated. Single photon emission computed tomographic systems require additional tests to ensure optimum performance. Center-of-rotation calibration and verification of detector registration are needed to avoid losses of spatial resolution. Flood corrections based on high-count images eliminate residual detector nonuniformiaties and correct for subtle collimator defects. Pixel size must be calibrated to avoid errors in attenuation correction and distortion when cardiac and brain reorientation software is used. Completed clinical studies must be checked for unacceptable patient movement and incomplete views. A quality control program may be time-consuming, but, from the standpoint of maximum benefit to patients and confidence in clinical interpretations, there is no alternative.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L S Graham. 1995. Quality control for SPECT systems.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.15.6.8577970

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗