Solid-phase nested deletion: a new subcloning-less method for generating nested deletions.

M Yohda; N Kato; I Endo

doi:10.1093/dnares/2.4.175

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8590281

Solid-phase nested deletion: a new subcloning-less method for generating nested deletions.

M Yohda·N Kato·I Endo

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We have developed a new subcloning-less method for generating nested deletions which we have termed Solid-Phase Nested Deletion. The basic procedure for this method is as follows. The target DNA fragment is cloned in the multiple cloning site of a cloning vector, pUC or its derivatives, and amplified by PCR using a set of primers, one of which is 5'-biotinylated. The amplified DNA is partially digested by a restriction enzyme with a 4-base recognition sequence. The digested DNA is ligated with a synthetic adapter DNA. Monodiverse beads coupled with streptavidin (Dynabeads M-280 streptavidin) are added to the mixture and the biotinylated DNA fragments are separated by applying magnetic field. The unidirectionally deleted DNA fragments are recovered by PCR from the magnetic beads, and size-fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The DNA fragments are amplified by PCR and used for sequencing. We demonstrate the potential of this method using a 4878-bp EcoRI fragment of lambda phage DNA.

Explore related subjects

Bacteriophage lambda Base Sequence Cloning, Molecular Deoxyribonuclease EcoRI Electrophoresis, Agar Gel Magnetics Molecular Sequence Data Polymerase Chain Reaction Restriction Mapping Sequence Analysis, DNA Sequence Deletion Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M Yohda, N Kato, I Endo. 1995-08-31. Solid-phase nested deletion: a new subcloning-less method for generating nested deletions.. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares%2F2.4.175

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Single-strand DNA intermediates in phage lambda's Red recombination pathway.

An assay was developed to assess early intermediates arising in lambda's Red recombination pathway. Double-strand breaks were delivered in vivo to nonreplicating lambda chromosomes. Analysis by blot hybridization of total DNA extracts revealed the following: (i) long (>1.4 kilobases) single-strand DNA (ssDNA) intermediates; (ii) resection proceeding bidirectionally from the break site; (iii) single-strand overhangs of 3' polarity; and (iv) in the absence of lambda's ninR functions, a requirement of the red alpha gene product for the production of ssDNA. Therefore, the physical characteristics exhibited by these ssDNA molecules are consistent with their being an early recombination intermediate in the Red recombination pathway as proposed previously from genetic and in vitro biochemical analyses.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

PubMed1997

An aromatic stacking interaction between subunits helps mediate DNA sequence specificity: operator site discrimination by phage lambda cI repressor.

Sequence specific DNA binding by regulatory proteins provides the basis for regulation of initiation of transcription. A great deal of progress has been made toward understanding sequence specific recognition by individual protein subunits. An additional level of control that needs to be understood is that due to coupling between the subunits of oligomeric regulatory proteins. An example is the bacteriophage lambda cI repressor, a dimeric protein that regulates the lysogenic to lytic genetic switch of the phage. Two levels of specificity are critical to this regulation. First, like all transcriptional regulators, dimers distinguish operator from nonspecific DNA. Direct readout of the DNA sequence by the recognition helix is considered the well understood mechanism for this. However, differential affinity for O(R)1, O(R)2 and O(R)3 is equally critical to the switch because it mediates opposing regulation of divergent promoters. Site specificity at this second level is less well understood. Conformational adaptation by both the repressor and the different operators appears to be important. To evaluate how subunit-subunit interactions are involved in this process, we investigated the effects on both dimer stability and operator binding of amino acid substitutions at the contacts between the symmetrically related helices-5 in the dimer interface. Substitutions for Tyr88 alter dimer stability and greatly perturb differential operator affinity, but generally do not affect operator versus non-operator specificity. The pattern of these effects suggests that the geometry of the face-to-face aromatic stacking interaction between symmetrically related Tyr88 in each subunit, a group in the dimer interface but far removed from the DNA binding interface, plays a critical role in operator discrimination. Conformational changes in the tertiary structure of the subunits appears to be involved. By contrast, the significant effect of I84S substitution is to greatly decrease affinity for all three operators. Presumably, the altered packing of the dimer interface causes a quarternary structural change that moves the two helix-turn-helix motifs out of register with successive DNA major grooves.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

PubMed1997

In vivo packaging of bacteriophage lambda monomeric chromosomes.

There is an apparent paradox between the reported requirements for lambda DNA packaging in vivo and in vitro. In vivo, DNA concatemers are required for packaging. On the other hand, in vitro, packaging extracts can encapsidate either linear or circular monomeric lambda DNA. Perhaps cellular nucleases restrict the in vivo ability of monomers to package by degrading a free double chain end present as an intermediate in the packaging reaction. Consistent with this hypothesis, enhanced packaging of monomers was found in an ExoV- host. No additional enhancement was noted in a host also mutant for sbcB and sbcC. We isolated a mutant phage for which in vivo packaging of monomeric lambda chromosomes is increased about 10(3)-fold. The responsible mutation (plm1 for packages lambda monomers) was mapped to cro, sequenced, and found to cause a change from Ala29 to Ser in the alpha3 helix of Cro's DNA binding domain. Density transfer experiments showed that packaging of both plm1 and wild-type lambda was aided by allowing some DNA synthesis. However, the packaged chromosomes had not themselves undergone a full round of replication and therefore were not part of a canonical concatemer made by replication. Other tests showed that packaged phage had not been part of concatemers made by recombination or by annealing at cos. Our results with wild-type lambda also favor models in which two cos sites are needed for packaging, but these sites need not be in cis. In lambda plm1, replication intermediates may serve as substrates for encapsidation.

Bacteriophage lambda↗