PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8601153

The custom implant impression coping: technical note.

Abstract

Unsupported soft tissue can collapse around a submerged implant or abutment head during the time interval between removal of the provisional prosthesis and placement of the impression material. A technique is described for accurately recording the implant or abutment position as well as the position of the soft tissue for a single tooth restoration using the provisional prosthesis as a custom implant impression coping.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C S Zouras, S Winkler. 1995. The custom implant impression coping: technical note.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8601153/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The single unit, single retainer, cantilever resin-bonded bridge.

Resin-bonded restorations have many advantages over conventional alternatives. Advances in adhesive technology together with a better understanding of the clinical function of such restorations have allowed resin-bonded bridges to play an important role in everyday clinical practice. This paper highlights the role and importance of the single abutment, single pontic cantilever resin-bonded bridge. Clinical experience might suggest that the cantilever design offers a viable alternative to other designs. Furthermore, the paper suggests that when cantilever resin-bonded bridges fail initially, re-bond often leads to predictable long-term success. Factors such as patient selection, abutment preparation, retainer design and the aesthetic limitations of resin-bonded bridges are also discussed. The authors can claim that further clinical studies are necessary to identify exactly what factors influence the success of cantilever and other resin-bonded designs.

Dental Abutments

Follow up and maintenance of implant supported prostheses: a comparison of 20 complete mandibular overdentures and 20 complete mandibular fixed cantilever prostheses.

Two independently selected groups of 20 patients who were edentulous in te mandible, were followed up on a regular basis over a 5-year period following restoration with a lower implant stabilised prosthesis and conventional upper denture. Significantly more treatment was required by those who received complete mandibular overdentures than those provided with complete fixed mandibular prostheses. In addition to adjustment for the relief of denture trauma to the mucosa, more mechanical problems arose with overdenture implant prostheses.

Dental Abutments

Ten years' clinical evaluation of three luting cements.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present clinical longitudinal study was to observe, over 10 years, the prognosis of abutment teeth restored with fixed prostheses retained by glass ionomer luting cements and one conventional zinc phosphate cement. METHODS: Three dentists prepared 135 abutment teeth in 61 patients to retain 81 fixed prostheses. The prostheses were retained by two glass ionomer luting cements (Ketac-Cem, Fuji Ionomer), or a conventional zinc phosphate cement (De Trey Zinc Zement Improved). The patients were examined yearly for 10 years. RESULTS: Post-operative hypersensitivity occurred in five teeth restored with glass ionomer luting cement. The prevailing reason for abutment tooth failure was secondary caries (n = 21) and pulp necrosis (n = 5). Non-parametric survival estimates indicated that 80-85% of the abutment teeth remained intact after 5 years and 71-81% after 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year results indicate that the prognosis of abutment teeth restored with fixed prostheses is good, regardless of whether a glass ionomer or a zinc phosphate luting cement is used.

Dental Abutments