Performance standards and edge detection with computerized quantitative coronary arteriography. The Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Group.

J L Klein; S J Boccuzzi; C B Treasure; S V Manoukian; R A Vogel; G J Beauman; D Fischman; M P Savage; W S Weintaub

doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89174-6

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8623732

Performance standards and edge detection with computerized quantitative coronary arteriography. The Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Group.

J L Klein·S J Boccuzzi·C B Treasure·S V Manoukian·R A Vogel·G J Beauman·D Fischman·M P Savage·W S Weintaub

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) has become an important tool for evaluating coronary angiograms. Many methodologic factors, such as the choice of frame to analyze, the selection of the "normal," segment and the method of edge detection used may affect the results of QCA. The sequential steps in performing QCA, including a comparison of visual and automated edge-detection methodologies, were evaluated using 12 precision-drilled phantoms and 20 patient films. Normal diameter, minimal lumen diameter, and diameter stenosis were measured. In the phantom studies, the measurements from both visual and automated systems correlated well with the true measurements of the phantoms and between systems (all r values >0.92). To study the difference between methodologies on QCA results as influenced by the choice of frame and normal segment analyzed, the patient films were analyzed independently in 3 separate rounds of interpretation. In round 1, each system's operator individually chose frames and normal segments for analysis. In round 2, both systems analyzed the same preselected frames, but independently chose normal segments. In round 3, both systems analyzed the same preselected normal segments and frames. The intersystem correlations between visual and automatic systems for rounds 1, 2, and 3 were: normal diameter, r = 0.25, r = 0.37, and r = 0.75, respectively; minimal lumen diameter, r = 0.79, r = 0.86, and r = 0.85, respectively; and diameter stenosis, r = 0.65, r = 0.73, and r = 0.87, respectively. The manual edge-detection and automated edge-detection systems used in this study are reasonably accurate and consistent on phantom studies. In patient studies, the nonautomated processes (choice of frame and normal segment for analysis) produced significant differences in the QCA results, thus illustrating that operator-dependent factors other than edge detection are very important in QCA.

Explore related subjects

Constriction, Pathologic Coronary Angiography Coronary Disease Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Observer Variation Phantoms, Imaging Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J L Klein, S J Boccuzzi, C B Treasure, S V Manoukian, R A Vogel, G J Beauman, D Fischman, M P Savage, W S Weintaub. 1996-04-15. Performance standards and edge detection with computerized quantitative coronary arteriography. The Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Group.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89174-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Computed tomographic enterography adds information to clinical management in small bowel Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: CT enterography yields striking findings in the bowel wall in Crohn's disease. These images may help to evaluate whether small bowel narrowing results from active disease requiring anti-inflammatory therapy. However, the clinical relevance of these images is unknown. It is also not known if these radiologic findings correlate with objective biomarkers of inflammation. METHODS: In a blinded and independent evaluation, IBD subspecialty gastroenterologists reviewed clinical data, and CT radiologists reviewed CT enterography scans of 67 consecutive patients with Crohn's disease and suspicion of either small bowel inflammation or stricture. Comparisons were made between (1) clinical and radiologic assessments of inflammation and stricture, (2) clinical assessments before and after computed tomographic enterography (CTE) reports were revealed, and (3) radiologic findings and objective biomarkers of inflammation. RESULTS: (1) Individual CTE findings correlated poorly (Spearman's rho < 0.30) with clinical assessment; (2) clinicians did not suspect 16% of radiologic strictures, and more than half the cases of clinically suspected strictures did not have them on CTE; (3) CTE data changed clinicians' perceptions of the likelihood of steroid benefit in 41 of 67 cases; (4) specific CTE findings correlated with CRP, and a distinct set of CTE findings correlated with ESR in the subset of patients who had these biomarkers measured. CONCLUSIONS: CTE seems to add unique information to clinical assessment, both in detecting additional strictures and in changing clinicians' perceptions of the likelihood of steroids benefiting patients. The biomarker correlations suggest that CTE is measuring real biologic phenomena that correlate with inflammation, providing information distinct from that in a standard clinical assessment.

Constriction, Pathologic↗

PubMed2007

[Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis: an uncommon, potentially fatal cause of inhibition of nasal breathing in neonates].

Congenital nasal pyriform stenosis can be a life threatening emergency in neonates which must be included in the differential diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction. We describe the case of a male child who developed symptoms 36 h after birth. As the conservative therapy was not successful surgery became necessary.

Constriction, Pathologic↗

PubMed2007

Optimization of spatial resolution for peripheral magnetic resonance angiography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine optimum spatial resolution when imaging peripheral arteries with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight vessel diameters ranging from 1.0 to 8.0 mm were simulated in a vascular phantom. A total of 40 three-dimensional flash MRA sequences were acquired with incremental variations of fields of view, matrix size, and slice thickness. The accurately known eight diameters were combined pairwise to generate 22 "exact" degrees of stenosis ranging from 42% to 87%. Then, the diameters were measured in the MRA images by three independent observers and with quantitative angiography (QA) software and used to compute the degrees of stenosis corresponding to the 22 "exact" ones. The accuracy and reproducibility of vessel diameter measurements and stenosis calculations were assessed for vessel size ranging from 6 to 8 mm (iliac artery), 4 to 5 mm (femoro-popliteal arteries), and 1 to 3 mm (infrapopliteal arteries). Maximum pixel dimension and slice thickness to obtain a mean error in stenosis evaluation of less than 10% were determined by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean errors on stenosis quantification were 8.8% +/- 6.3% for 6- to 8-mm vessels, 15.5% +/- 8.2% for 4- to 5-mm vessels, and 18.9% +/- 7.5% for 1- to 3-mm vessels. Mean errors on stenosis calculation were 12.3% +/- 8.2% for observers and 11.4% +/- 15.1% for QA software (P = .0342). To evaluate stenosis with a mean error of less than 10%, maximum pixel surface, the pixel size in the phase direction, and the slice thickness should be less than 1.56 mm2, 1.34 mm, 1.70 mm, respectively (voxel size 2.65 mm3) for 6- to 8-mm vessels; 1.31 mm2, 1.10 mm, 1.34 mm (voxel size 1.76 mm3), for 4- to 5-mm vessels; and 1.17 mm2, 0.90 mm, 0.9 mm (voxel size 1.05 mm3) for 1- to 3-mm vessels. CONCLUSION: Higher spatial resolution than currently used should be selected for imaging peripheral vessels.

Constriction, Pathologic↗