PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8628421

[Improvement in the internists' outpatient report using a time control system and systematic feedback by the general practitioner].

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish if the letters from internists contain the information wanted by the GP and if the quality of these letters can be improved by a time control system and by systematic feedback from the GP to the internist. DESIGN: Questionnaire study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic for General Internal Diseases, University Hospital Nijmegen. METHOD: The 284 GPs in the region were polled about their requirements for information in terms of speed and contents. Patient files were examined to find out to what extent the outpatient department met these requirements. The outpatient clinic physicians were informed of the findings. Subsequently a control system was introduced; every letter was accompanied by a postage-paid evaluation card inviting the GPs to comment. The findings obtained were reported back to the outpatient department physicians. RESULTS: GPs appreciated a preliminary report after the first outpatient visit (response rate: 70%). In the final report, they particularly wanted information on diagnosis, treatment, management to be conducted and information given to the patient. The control system accelerated final reporting. Of the evaluation cards 75% were returned; the explanation concerning diagnosis and treatment was experienced as sufficient, while mention of the information given to the patient was not always found satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The internists' letters did not optimally meet the GPs' need of information. A 'time control system' accelerated the final reporting on newly referred patients. A systematic feedback of the GPs' opinions on the quality of the letters improved the alignment of the information provided with the GPs' requirements.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A R van 't Hoff, L G van Kaathoven, J F Fennis. 1996-02-17. [Improvement in the internists' outpatient report using a time control system and systematic feedback by the general practitioner].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8628421/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗