PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8642146

Ridge preservation: why not?

Abstract

Ridge preservation should be a commonly used dental procedure. However, it is not. Simple ridge preservation techniques, using materials such as HTR, provide undeniable esthetic and functional benefits to patients and dentists.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G J Christensen. 1996. Ridge preservation: why not?. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0279

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Three-dimensional interpretation of alveolar bone dehiscences. An anatomical-radiological study--Part I.

In an anatomical-radiological in-vitro study dental radiographs were compared with axial, sagittal and coronal CT-scans, with respect to the identification and quantitative assessment of bone dehiscences and the buccal or lingual bone plates over the roots of the teeth. After removal of soft tissue and metallic restorations in 16 dentate jaw specimens, 60 lingual or buccal defects of different dimensions were artificially created over the roots. None of the defects could be identified on conventional dental radiographs. In contrast, 42 of the 60 (70%) artificial defects were identified in the CT-scans. Identification and demarcation of the facial/lingual bone plate depends on the orientation of the CT-scanning, the visibility of the periodontal ligament space, the dimension of the defect, and the thickness and histological structure of the adjacent bone. A visible periodontal ligament space improves the measuring accuracy of buccal or lingual bone plates up to 0.2 mm.

Alveolar Bone Loss

[Computerized tomography of the alveolar process].

In addition to the conventional radiological methods used in odontology, computed tomography (CT) provides superposition-free images of the mandible and maxilla. Its value has been proved not only in cases of malignancy but also in many other problems. If an examination is performed with a slice thickness of less than 1.5 mm, the form and position of retained teeth in the alveolar bone, as well as subsequent lesions of neighboring permanent teeth, can be visualized so that early treatment can be planned. If the parodontal space of a retained tooth is visible, orthodontic intervention is possible. Precise assessment of horizontal or vertical bone loss is essential in inflammatory dental diseases. The morphology and extent of benign cystic lesions are also shown by CT. With CT surgical strategy of an intended implant therapy can take into account the remaining bone substance and the exact position of nerves and foramina. If such therapy is possible, the location, form and number of implants are easily defined.

Alveolar Bone Loss

Immunolocalization of the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor and cathepsin B in the enamel organ and alveolar bone of the rat incisor.

In order to examine our hypothesis that maturation ameloblasts could degrade the enamel matrix in a manner analogous to bone resorption mediated by osteoclasts, we have assessed the distribution of lysosomal enzymes in the enamel organ by immunolocalizing the cation-in-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (MPR) and the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin B at all stages of amelogenesis. Secretory ameloblasts showed strong immunoreactivity for MPR in the supranuclear Golgi region and in the cytoplasm between the Golgi region and the distal junctional complexes. However, cathepsin B immunoreactivity was mainly seen in the distal portion of Tomes' process, which was unreactive for MPR immunogenicity. In maturation ameloblasts, the MPR was observed on the ruffled border of the ruffle-ended ameloblast (RA) but not on the distal cell membrane of the smooth-ended ameloblast (SA), although both cell types demonstrated strong immunoreactivity for MPR in the Golgi region. Immunoreactive cathepsin B was seen at the distal ends of both RA and SA. It is postulated that the nascent lysosomal enzymes bind to the mannose 6-phosphate receptors which target them not only to intracellular lysosomes, but also to the ruffled border of maturation ameloblasts where these enzymes are secreted into the enamel. Since MPR and lysosomal enzymes were also detected on the ruffled border of osteoclasts (Ocl) adjacent to alveolar bone, our immunocytochemical approach provides strong evidence for a similarity between the maturation process in enamel, as mediated by the ruffle-ended maturation ameloblasts, and bone resorption mediated by osteoclasts. This study has established that a common mechanism, based on MPR-targeted lysosomal secretion and matrix degradation, is basic to the maturation process involved in calcified tissues as different as bone and enamel.

Alveolar Bone Loss