PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 864776

Health manpower-planning without objectives.

Abstract

Health manpower developments of the past decade have resulted in an absolute increase in the number of health personnel, the expansion of the roles of some traditional categories of personnel, and the introduction of new professional categories. Inherent in these developments has been the acceptance of the principal that the relative and absolute increase in manpower would result in an increased availability of health services. Unfortunately, in the last decade, the correlation between increased numbers and increased services is not a strong one. The failure to link manpower needs to specific service objectives and to identify appropriate rates of substitution among professional types has resulted in a wastage of funds and energies.A framework for future planning must now be developed which (1) defines service priorities, (2) delineates the functions required to deliver those services, and (3) defines appropriate manpower categories with their rates of substitution to perform those functions. Training programs must be coordinated to allow appropriate linkages among categorical types of personnel. The maldistribution of health care service must be viewed as a result of the demographic maldistribution among the health professions as well as the maldistribution of organizational and financial incentives for provision of priority services as well as utilization of priority services.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S A Roman. 1977. Health manpower-planning without objectives.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/864776/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The effectiveness of academic admission interviews: an exploratory meta-analysis.

Admission to health-related professions is very competitive and selecting candidates with the best prospects for success is critical. A variety of measures are used to assess candidates to predict success. The purpose of this research was to assess the effectiveness of using selection interviews for admissions. Meta-analysis was applied to a sample of 20 studies examined in a comprehensive review article on the use of interviews in healthcare academic disciplines. Nineteen of these studies examined the relationship between performance in an interview situation and academic performance, while 10 examined the relationship between performance in an interview situation and clinical performance. A separate meta-analysis was conducted for each category of performance measure. The mean sample-size-effect size for studies examining the predictive power of interviews for academic success was 0.06 (95% confidence intervals 0.03-0.08), indicating a very small effect. The sample of studies was homogeneous using a fixed-effect model. The sample of studies for predicting clinical success had a mean effect size of 0.17 (95% confidence intervals 0.11-0.22), indicating modest positive predictive power. Using a random-effects model, this sample of studies was also homogeneous. Future research should investigate a larger sample of primary studies.

Health Occupations↗