PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8657401

Screening for cervical cancer.

Abstract

It is well accepted that conscientious and widespread use of cervical cytology will significantly decrease the incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer. The Papanicolaou smear for cervical cytology fulfills all the criteria for an ideal screening test. Not only is it cost effective, acceptable to most patients, and adaptable to widespread screening, it is sensitive enough to detect preinvasive disease resulting in decreased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, in developing countries cervical cancer still occurs at epidemic proportions, where an estimated 460,000 new cases per annum will be diagnosed, a significant proportion of which will be in advanced stages. First world notions pertaining to screening have proved unrealistic for the developing health care system of third world nations. This article provides an overview of screening for cervical cancer and considers cytological smearing, cervicography and direct visualization of the cervix, be it without or with the application of 4 percent acetic acid.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Guidozzi. 1996. Screening for cervical cancer.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199604000-00021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Costs of surgeries in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is essential for achieving global health equity, yet low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face major gaps in access and planning, partly due to limited evidence on the costs and resource requirements of surgical interventions. Understanding these costs is vital for designing efficient and equitable health systems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review (covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, EconLit and grey literature) to identify studies reporting the costs of surgeries in LMICs from January 2000 to June 2023. Minor and major surgical procedures were considered, focusing on therapeutic procedures (excluding diagnostic interventions). Studies that clearly identified, quantified and costed hospital resources and services deployed in the provision of surgical care, and included at least two of the surgical production factors (ie, consumables, diagnostics, personnel, infrastructure and overhead) in the costing were included. Costs were standardised to 2023 International dollars (I$) for comparability. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies from 29 countries met the inclusion criteria, with 210 cost estimates across 65 procedure groups. Costs varied widely: from I$1.54 for a caesarean section in Tanzania to I$618 098 for paediatric cataract surgery in Zambia. Full costing studies reported higher estimates than partial costing studies. Most studies (60%) originated from upper-middle-income countries, with limited data (10%) from low-income settings. CONCLUSION: This review provides a reference list of surgical procedure costs across LMICs, highlighting considerable cost variation by procedure, specialty and country. The findings underscore the need for better-quality, standardised cost data-especially from low-income countries-to inform national surgical plans, universal health coverage benefit packages and reimbursement policies.

Developing Countries↗