PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8657872

Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis.

Abstract

The future of image processing and CAD in diagnostic radiology is more promising now than ever, with increasingly impressive results being reported from various observer performance studies in both mammography and chest radiography. Clinical trials in years to come will help optimize the accuracy of the programs and determine the actual contribution of CAD to the interpretation process. Radiologists using output from computer analyses of images, however, will still make the final decision regarding diagnosis and patient management. Nonetheless, studies have indicated that the computer output need not have greater overall accuracy than a given radiologist in order to improve his or her performance. A systematic and gradual introduction of CAD into radiology departments will be necessary so that radiologists can become familiar with the strengths and weaknesses of each CAD program, thereby avoiding either excessive reliance or a dismissive attitude toward the computer output. This should ensure the acceptance of CAD and optimal diagnostic performance by the radiologist. Thus, an appropriate role for each CAD program will be determined for each radiologist, according to his or her individual training and observational skills, reducing intraobserver variations and improving diagnostic performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Giger, H MacMahon. 1996. Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8657872/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A computer program for assessing interexaminer agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject.

This report describes a computer program for applying a new statistical method for determining levels of agreement, or reliability, when multiple examiners evaluate a single subject. The statistics that are performed include the following: an overall level of agreement, expressed as a percentage, that takes into account all possible levels of partial agreement; the same statistical approach for deriving a separate level of agreement of every examiner with every other examiner; and tests of the extent to which a giver examiner's rating (say a symptom score of three on a five-category ordinal rating scale) deviates from the group or overall average rating. These deviation scores are interpreted as standard Z statistics. Finally, both statistical and clinical criteria are provided to evaluate levels of interexaminer agreement.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted

A new method for assessing interexaminer agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject: applications to the assessment of neuropsychiatric symtomatology.

A new method is introduced for assessing levels of interexaminer agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject, with an application in psychiatric research. It is designed to provide an overall level of interexaminer agreement and separate indices of agreement for each examiner. These indices are based on biostatistical and clinical criteria to determine whether the ratings of any given examiner are appreciably higher or lower than the group average, or a consensus diagnosis. A number of examples, from ongoing psychiatric research, are provided to illustrate conditions favoring the application of the new methodology. Finally, the necessary software for performing the analyses is available to clinical investigators with interest in this area of assessment.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted