PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 866061

Specific and general contour adaptation effects found using a selective adaptation paradigm.

Abstract

There is evidence for discrete property analyzers in mammalian visual systems. Research has indicated that prolonged stimulation of such units reduces their sensitivity to subsequent stimulation. Psychophysical studies have employed this effect, terned selective adaptation, to study feature extractors in the human visual system. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of density and deviation in the adaptation figure on the recognition thresholds of simple and complex text figures. A selective adaptation paradigm was employed. A strict property analyzer model suggests that increases in density, deviation, or complexity should lead to an increased recognition time for the test figures. This was not confirmed. The complexity of the test figure had no effect on its recognition time. Both increased density and deviation did have an effect on the recognition times of the test figures. The results thus suggest that contour adaptation involves at least two processes: a general, probably peripheral effect due to the fatigue of visual receptor units and a more specific effect generated by the similarity between test figure and adaptation contours, independent of the site of stimulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E R Goedert, A S Rodwan, P G Salmon. 1977. Specific and general contour adaptation effects found using a selective adaptation paradigm.. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.551

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: dissociation of shape from size.

We measured the accuracy with which subjects judged that a square or circle was perfectly symmetrical i.e. that aspect ratio (a/b) was exactly unity (where a and b were, respectively, the vertical and horizontal dimensions). Errors were remarkably small, ranging from 0.7 to 0.4% for the judgement of squareness and from 1.4 to < 0.1% for the judgement of circularity. Precision in judging aspect ratio was measured by requiring subjects to judge whether the aspect ratio (a/b)TEST of a test rectangle was greater or less than the aspect ratio (a/b)REF of a reference rectangle. Similar measurements were made for elliptical targets. To ensure that subjects based judgements on aspect ratio rather than a, b or (a-b), the area of each successive presentation was varied randomly. The just-discriminable percentage change of aspect ratio was as low as 1.6% at (a/b)REF = 1.0 (i.e. for a square or circular reference), and rose progressively as (a/b)REF was made progressively larger or smaller than 1.0. Aspect ratio discrimination threshold was independent of mean area over a sixteen-fold range of 0.25-4.0 deg2. For both rectangles and ellipses, the best value of aspect ratio discrimination threshold corresponded to a precision of encoding a and b of 14 sec arc or better. In further experiments, the method of constant stimuli was used to measure an aspect ratio aftereffect produced by adapting separately to rectangles of (a/b)ADAPT equal to 1.5, 1.0 and (1/1.5). Similar aftereffects were obtained whether the area of the test stimulus was fixed or varied randomly from trial to trial, and whether the test stimulus was rectangular or elliptical. The aftereffect could not be explained in terms of fatigue of neurons sensitive to linear dimension a or b. Nor could the aftereffect be explained in terms of the "contour repulsion" hypothesis, or in terms of orientation discrimination. We conclude (1) that the same neural mechanism determines aspect ratio discrimination threshold for rectangles and ellipses and (2) that this mechanism is sensitive to aspect ratio independently of linear dimensions. We propose that aspect ratio perception is determined by the balance of excitation of two pools of neurons that are selectively sensitive to different, but overlapping ranges of (a/b). One pool prefers aspect ratios > 1.0 and the others prefer aspect ratios < 1.0. We suppose that the two pools respond identically to changes in area (a * b).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adaptation, Ocular

Dynamic noise backgrounds facilitate target fading.

With strict fixation, a small uniform target of medium contrast, placed at 10 deg eccentricity, faded much faster when presented on a dynamic random noise background than on either a static random noise background or a uniform background of the same luminance. Time to first disappearance was between 10 and 16 sec when the background was dynamic, 26 sec when it was static, and 57 sec when it was uniform. Times were shortest for temporal noise frequencies of the background between 3.5 and 15 Hz. These findings are unexpected: the frequent change of pixel contrast at the edge of the target should perceptually enhance the border, make it less susceptible to local adaptation, and prevent fading. Instead, dynamic random noise facilitates, rather than suppresses fading. Three potential mechanisms are discussed: edge perturbation, jerk effect and surround induction.

Adaptation, Ocular

Red-green and yellow-blue opponent-color responses as a function of retinal eccentricity.

Using the hue cancellation technique, I measured the spectral sensitivities of red-green (r-g) and yellow-blue (y-b) opponent-color responses of two color-normal observers at 0 (fovea), 3.3, 10, 21, and 31 degrees along the horizontal meridian of the temporal retina. The stimulus size as a function of retinal eccentricity was varied according to the cortical magnification factor. I found that the net spectral sensitivity (i.e. corrected for macular pigment) of the r-g channel was approximately constant as a function of retinal eccentricity. On the other hand, the net spectral sensitivity of the y-b channel was not constant. For the y-b channel I found a constant spectral sensitivity as a function of eccentricity when no macular correction was made. This means that the y-b system changes its yellow and blue responses with eccentricity to counterbalance the effects of macular pigment.

Adaptation, Ocular