Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.

G W McConkie; C B Currie

doi:10.1037//0096-1523.22.3.563

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8666953

Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.

G W McConkie·C B Currie

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As people examine their world, the proximal stimulus changes position on their retinae with every saccade, but they perceive the world as being stable. This phenomenon of visual stability was explored by making changes in natural, full-color pictures during selected saccades as observers examined them in preparation for a recognition test. In Experiment 1, the pictures were displaced up, down, left, or right by 0.3, 0.4, or 1.2 degrees. In Experiment 2, the pictures were expanded or contracted by 10% or 20%. As a secondary task, subjects pressed a button when a change was detected. Three results from previous studies with simpler stimuli did not generalize. Evidence suggests that subjects' detection of image changes primarily involves the use of local information in the region of the eyes' landing position. A saccade target theory of visual stability is proposed.

Explore related subjects

Attention Color Perception Discrimination Learning Distance Perception Generalization, Stimulus Humans Mental Recall Orientation Pattern Recognition, Visual Psychophysics Reaction Time Saccades Size Perception Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

G W McConkie, C B Currie. 1996. Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0096-1523.22.3.563

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Experimental psychology. In a blink of the mind's eye.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Attention↗

PubMed1997

Attentional requirements in a 'preattentive' feature search task.

It is commonly assumed that certain features are so elementary to the visual system that they require no attentional resources to be perceived. Such 'preattentive' features are traditionally identified by visual search performance, in which the reaction time for detecting a feature difference against a set of distractor items does not increase with the number of distractors. This suggests an unlimited capacity for the perception of such features. We provide evidence to the contrary, demonstrating that detection of differences in a simple feature such as orientation is severely impaired by additionally imposing an attentionally demanding rapid serial visual presentation task involving letter identification. The same visual stimuli exhibit non-increasing reaction time versus set-size functions. These results demonstrate that attention can be critical even for the detection of so-called 'preattentive' features.

Attention↗

PubMed1997

Are subjects' perceptual asymmetries on auditory and visual language tasks correlated?: a meta-analysis.

A number of studies have investigated the correlation between subjects' perceptual asymmetries on auditory and visual language tasks. With few exceptions, these studies have found low, nonsignificant correlations between the two types of perceptual asymmetries. However, variations in subjects' perceptual asymmetries on these tasks reflect not only individual differences in language lateralization but also several extraneous variables (e.g., random errors, individual differences in left-right attentional biases). Thus, low correlations between the two types of asymmetries may reflect "masking" by these extraneous variables rather than a "true" cross-modal dissociation. Consistent with this view, a meta-analysis of prior studies revealed a small, but significant correlation between the two types of asymmetries for left-handers. The correlation was nonsignificant for right-handers, presumably reflecting stronger attenuation caused by limited variability in language lateralization in this group. Possible factors mediating significant correlations between the two types of perceptual asymmetries include certain language processes shared by the two types of tasks, cross-modal consistency in individual differences in lateralization of certain modality-specific language processes, and cross-modal consistency in individual differences in left-right attentional biases.

Attention↗