PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8667300

Prosodic form and parsing commitments.

Abstract

This paper examines the question of whether there are effects of prosody on the syntactic parsing of temporarily ambiguous sentences containing complement verbs. It reports the results of five experiments employing cross-modal response tasks where the visually presented target word was either an ¿appropriate' or an ¿inappropriate' continuation in terms of the prosodic form of the preceeding auditory sentence fragment. Two experiments employing cross-modal naming only showed indications of sensitivity to syntactic and appropriateness manipulations when coupled with a simultaneous appropriateness judgment task. In contrast, the experiments employing cross-modal lexical decision showed greater sensitivity to syntactic and appropriateness effects. However, while the results from these studies replicated our earlier auditory parsing results and provided support for the suggestion that there are differences in visual and auditory parsing processes and for a ¿constituent-based, ' ¿minimal commitment' type auditory parser, none of the studies demonstrated an effect of prosodic form on the parsing process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S M Watt, W S Murray. 1996. Prosodic form and parsing commitments.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01708575

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Flexibility in the structure of human information processing.

The studies reported in this chapter argue for a flexible organization of higher mental processes, including perceptual and attentional systems in the visual modality and attentional systems related to action. There is electrophysiologic evidence that the visual perceptual system has a modularized structure, and that selection of perceived features is adjustable to sensory, conceptual, and utility constraints, both with respect to the hierarchy of selection cues and the transmission of information between perception and action. A distributed neural network subserves these functions and may therefore provide a source for plasticity and reorganization after brain damage by flexibility in the allocation of resources to various stages of stimulus analysis.

Cognition

Prefrontal function in schizophrenia: confounds and controversies.

A wealth of clinical data indirectly implicate dysfunction of frontal cortex in schizophrenia, including negative symptoms, the pattern of neuropsychological deficits, and abnormal eye movements. Neuroimaging studies have provided direct evidence of frontal, particularly prefrontal, malfunction, but the results have been inconsistent and controversial. The burning question is whether prefrontal hypofunction is a pathophysiological characteristic of schizophrenia per se or an artifact of the imaging protocol. In studies of patients at rest, 'hypofrontality' has been an inconsistent finding, probably because resting is physiologically and psychologically variable. Cognitive activation paradigms, especially during working memory tasks, have been reliable in showing prefrontal hypofunction in patients, but these results have been challenged as artifacts of poor performance. Performance differences have been addressed by studying patients and controls matched either for poor performance or for normal performance. The former approach, which has the potential of elucidating the specificity of physiological mechanisms associated with poor performance, has shown that prefrontal activity in patients with schizophrenia differs quantitatively and qualitatively from that of normals and of other patient populations who perform at a comparable level. The latter approach, which tends not to find prefrontal differences between patients and controls, may be selecting out important aspects of the disease by focusing on unaffected neural functions. While there are pitfalls to each approach and no single study can address all the potential phenomenological confounds, overall, the functional neuroimaging database in patients with schizophrenia suggests that prefrontal cognitive deficits are because of prefrontal pathophysiology and not the inverse.

Cognition