PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8669016

Laparoscopic colon resection.

Abstract

Laparoscopic colectomy, usually performed in a laparoscopy-assisted fashion, is a technically difficult operation not easily mastered by the average surgeon and requiring a skilled team for its successful completion. There is a significant learning curve for the procedure, and conversion to open colectomy has been necessary in about 25% of cases in collected series. As such, its popularity has increased only slowly, and currently it is appropriate for treatment of benign colonic disease and as a palliative approach for unresectable carcinoma. Although the procedure produces an adequate tissue resection, concern about trocar site tumor recurrences has led to the general consensus that the procedure should currently be done only in a prospective investigational protocol setting for the treatment of curable colorectal carcinoma. These studies are expected to yield the data critically needed to assess its role in treating this disease. Experience to date suggests that laparoscopic colectomy can be performed with morbidity and mortality lower than or comparable to those of open colectomy. It likely is associated with less postoperative pain and a shorter hospitalization and has the potential for modestly more rapid recovery of gastro-intestinal function than open colectomy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B D Schirmer. 1996. Laparoscopic colon resection.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70463-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Gastric amphicrine carcinoma in the stomach: an unexpected presentation of MUTYH-associated polyposis.

Amphicrine carcinomas of the stomach, defined by dual exocrine and neuroendocrine differentiation within the same neoplastic cell, are exceedingly rare. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple colorectal adenomas and variable upper gastrointestinal involvement; however, amphicrine carcinomas have not been previously documented in this setting. We report a gastric amphicrine carcinoma arising in the background of extensive fundic gland polyposis in a patient with MAP. Endoscopy revealed a 3.5-cm flat elevated lesion in the gastric fundus amid extensive fundic gland polyposis. Histologically, the tumor consisted of a single population of cells exhibiting combined glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation without zonal or biphasic architecture, and many of these cells demonstrated true amphicrine morphology. Immunohistochemistry confirmed co-expression of cytokeratin and the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin in the same cell population. Germline targeted next-generation sequencing identified biallelic MUTYH variants in trans (c.733C>T, p.Arg245Cys [likely pathogenic]; c.842C>T, p.Ala281Val [variant of uncertain significance]), supporting a diagnosis of MAP. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a gastric amphicrine carcinoma in a MAP patient, expanding the spectrum of MAP-associated upper gastrointestinal neoplasia and underscoring the importance of vigilant endoscopic surveillance in hereditary polyposis syndromes.

Carcinoma

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma.

On the basis of epidemiological observations that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs reduce the risk of esophageal carcinoma, we studied the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs; n = 172) and in esophageal adenocarcinomas (ADCs; n = 27). Using immunohistochemistry, we observed COX-2 expression in 91% of the SCCs and in 78% of the ADCs. Western blot analysis showed enhanced expression of the COX-2 protein in some tumors as compared with normal esophageal squamous epithelium, whereas similar amounts of the COX-1 protein were found in normal and cancerous tissues. COX expression was also studied in two esophageal cancer cell lines (OSC-1 and OSC-2) to evaluate the functional relevance of COX-2-derived prostaglandins (PGs). OSC-2 cells expressed COX-2 but not COX-1, whereas OSC-1 cells expressed high levels of COX-1 but showed only a very weak COX-2 expression. Accordingly, PGE2 synthesis was 600 times higher in the OSC-2 cells as compared with the OSC-1 cells. Treatment of OSC-2 cells with the selective COX-2 inhibitors flosulide and NS-398 concentration dependently suppressed PGE2 synthesis and proliferation and also induced apoptosis. In contrast, no effect of the COX-2 inhibitors was seen in OSC-1 cells. Our data demonstrate that COX-2 is expressed in the majority of esophageal SCCs and ADCs and that COX-2-derived PGs play an important role in the regulation of proliferation and apoptosis of esophageal tumor cells. It is concluded that inhibition of COX-2 may be useful in the therapy of esophageal cancer.

Carcinoma

Differences in p16 gene methylation and expression in benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that DNA methylation is important for silencing the p16 tumor suppressor gene in ovarian epithelial tumors and to compare the prevalence of this mechanism among different ovarian epithelial tumor subtypes. METHOD: Methylation-specific PCR was used to analyze the p16 gene for DNA methylation in 20 ovarian cystadenomas, 15 low malignant potential (LMP) tumors, and 37 carcinomas. p16 expression was determined immunohistochemically in 58 of these tumors (16 cystadenomas, 13 LMP tumors, 29 carcinomas). Differences in methylation or expression rates between specific tumor subgroups were examined by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Fragments from the distal promoter and beginning of the first exon of the p16 gene were both methylated in 5 of 15 (33%) LMP tumors compared to 2 of 37 (5%) carcinomas (P = 0. 02). Those sites were also methylated in 5 of 20 (25%) cystadenomas. Lack of p16 expression was present in 7 of 16 cystadenomas, 4 of 13 LMP tumors, and 22 of 29 carcinomas (P [LMPs versus carcinomas] = 0. 01) and correlated with methylation changes in LMP tumors (P = 0.05). p16 expression was correlated with mucinous differentiation in cystadenomas (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: p16 silencing may be important for the development of ovarian carcinomas and a subset of LMP tumors. Changes in DNA methylation may be more important for inactivation of this gene (and perhaps other tumor suppressor genes) in LMP tumors, which lack many of the alternative mechanisms present in carcinomas. p16 expression is primarily related to mucinous differentiation in cystadenomas.

Carcinoma