The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program.

N Joshi; G Kodwany; D Balaiah; M Parikh; F Parikh

PubMed · 8673156

The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program.

N Joshi·G Kodwany·D Balaiah·M Parikh·F Parikh

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship of sperm motion characteristics, sperm morphology, and hypo-osmotic swelling test with fertilization rates in vitro. DESIGN: Computer-assisted measures of fresh seminal and processed sperm preparations, sperm morphology, and hypo-osmotic swelling test results were assessed for predicting fertilization by step-wise regression analysis. SETTINGS: In vitro fertilization laboratory, department of infertility management, university affiliated-hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. PATIENTS: One hundred and two couples who underwent IVF were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Computer-assisted sperm motion variables in semen and following semen processing in capacitating media; hypo-osmotic swelling of sperm tails before and after semen processing; morphology of sperm before and after processing; fertilization of oocytes as evidenced by presence of two pronuclei as the end point. RESULTS: Various sperm motion parameters, hypo-osmotic swelling test results, and normal morphology of sperm were directly correlated to fertilization as judged by the Karl-Pearsons test. However, in step-wise regression analysis, normal morphology of sperm from seminal fraction exhibited 61% correlation with fertilization rates (P < .001). In step 2, normal morphology along with percent motility exhibited a 64% correlation with fertilization rates (P < .001). In step 3, normal morphology, percent motility, and linearity showed a 67% correlation with fertilization rates (P < .001). The hypo-osmotic swelling test did not predict fertilization rates (regression coefficient = 0.066, P = 0.474). In the processed sample preparations, normal sperm morphology showed a 72% correlation with fertilization rate (P < .001). In step 2, normal morphology along with curvilinear velocity exhibited a 77% correlation with fertilization rates (P < .001). In step 3, normal morphology, curvilinear velocity, and average path velocity showed a 79% correlation with fertilization rates (P < .001). The hypo-osmotic swelling test did not predict fertilization rates (regression coefficient = 0.076, P = 0.512). CONCLUSIONS: Morphology of sperm and computer-assisted sperm motion variables, such as motility, linearity, curvilinear velocity, and average path velocity, may serve as prognostic indicators for fertilization potential of sperm. The hypo-osmotic swelling test may describe only physiological intactness, rather than the fertilization potential of sperm. The results suggest that objective analysis of sperm motion characteristics and precise sperm morphology may form a first, and obligatory, step for critical evaluation of patients before they start IVF treatment.

Explore related subjects

Fertilization in Vitro Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Male Osmosis Regression Analysis Semen Sperm Motility Spermatozoa Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

N Joshi, G Kodwany, D Balaiah, M Parikh, F Parikh. The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8673156/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Autonomy versus protection--who benefits from the regulation of IVF?

Parliament will soon be asked to decide about the future regulation of IVF in the United Kingdom. Given that IVF is now considered to be a routine clinical procedure and the fact that we live in an age of unprecedented emphasis on autonomy and patient rights, the justification for continuing to regulate this form of treatment will undoubtedly be challenged. This article considers the four key reasons why the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) was originally established-to protect patients and their children, to allay public concerns, to protect scientific freedom and to protect IVF practitioners from claims of unethical behaviour-and asks to what extent these reasons are still valid today. Acknowledging that there are difficulties and frustrations with the HFEA, the article warns that all parties-patients, researchers, IVF practitioners and society-have a lot to lose by limiting the scope of regulation. It concludes that before moving too quickly to get rid of the HFEA as we know it, we need to think carefully about whether the burdens and restrictions imposed by regulation are sufficiently onerous to justify this loss.

Fertilization in Vitro↗

PubMed2006

Optimal stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To update clinicians on different gonadotropin regimens for ovarian stimulation for IVF including the use of urinary and recombinant gonadotropins, the value of added LH to FSH in the stimulation regimen, the use of GnRH agonists and antagonists, and the role of minimal stimulation protocols. DESIGN: Literature review and critical analysis of major articles during the last five years on ovarian stimulation for IVF. CONCLUSION(S): Urinary and recombinant gonadotropins, for ovarian stimulation for IVF, are probably equally safe and effective. The higher cost for recombinant products limits their worldwide use in IVF. Conflicting data exist regarding the benefit of adding LH to FSH in the stimulation regimens. The use of different GnRH-agonists, of varying potency, may account for different levels of LH suppression. Adding LH should be considered in severe situations of LH suppression such as with the use of potent GnRH-agonists or when GnRH-antagonists are introduced during the course of stimulation. GnRH-antagonists provide advantages to patients in terms of fewer injections, shorter stimulation days, and avoidance of adverse effects of agonists. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is probably less with antagonists compared to agonists, with the option to use an agonist as a surrogate LH surge. Fixed and early start of the antagonist is probably more effective than an individualized and late start. The earlier reported lower pregnancy rates with antagonists compared to agonists is not fully understood and needs to be continually monitored. Minimal stimulation protocols using a combination of clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins are attractive and should be considered in some patients owing to lower costs and acceptable success rates. The optimal stimulation protocol for IVF should be an individualized regimen based on the patient's ovarian physiology and prior IVF experience, if any.

Fertilization in Vitro↗

PubMed2006

Professional self-regulation for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: experience of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and other professional societies.

Professional societies that are stakeholders in preimplantation genetic diagnosis have democratically elected officers and favor self-regulation. Their practice guidelines are cognizant of societal needs and allow for introduction of new technologies. These societies have demonstrated the ability for professional self-regulation by collection, validation, and promulgation of center-specific results.

Fertilization in Vitro↗