PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8674017

Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic malignancy.

P A di Sant'Agnese·A T Cockett
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prostatic neuroendocrine cell is a regulatory cell that produces serotonin and peptide hormones. This cell is part of a more widely dispersed diffuse neuroendocrine regulatory system known as the APUD system. Focal neuroendocrine differentiation is seen in virtually all prostate carcinomas to one degree or another. Specific malignancies that are purely neuroendocrine include small cell carcinoma and carcinoid/carcinoid-like tumors. A variety of studies suggest a possible prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma. METHODS: The literature on the prostatic neuroendocrine cell and neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma is reviewed. RESULTS: Based on analogy with other better studied elements of the diffuse neuroendocrine regulatory system or APUD system, as well as the morphology and specific products produced by neuroendocrine cells, it is likely that they play an important regulatory role in the prostate. Neuroendocrine differentiation may be of prognostic significance in prostate carcinoma. Mechanisms are not well characterized at this point, but the known growth factor activity of the neuroendocrine cell products, an increase in proliferation in cells surrounding neuroendocrine cells, and a lack of androgen receptor expression in neuroendocrine cells, suggest mechanisms by which they may be of prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma may be of prognostic significance, but better methods to define neuroendocrine, differentiation are necessary. The therapeutic implications of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma may be of significance and need to be explored further.

Explore related subjects

APUD CellsCarcinoid TumorCarcinomaCarcinoma, Small CellCell DifferentiationCell DivisionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGrowth SubstancesHormonesHumansMaleNeuroendocrine TumorsNeurosecretory SystemsPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, AndrogenSerotoninJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P A di Sant'Agnese, A T Cockett. 1996-07-15. Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic malignancy.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960715)78%3A2%3C357%3A%3Aaid-cncr27%3E3.0.co%3B2-u

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Evolution of the diffuse neuroendocrine system--clear cells and cloudy origins.

As early as the 2nd century, Galen proposed that 'vital spirits' in the blood regulated human bodily functions. However, the concept of hormonal activity required a further 18 centuries to develop and relied upon the identification of 'ductless glands', Schwann's cell and the recognition by Bayliss and Starling of chemical messengers. Bernard's introduction of 'internal secretion' and its role in homeostasis laid a physiological basis for the development of endocrinology. Kocher and Addison recognized the consequences of ablation of glands by disease or surgery and identified their necessary role in life. Detailed descriptions of the endocrine cells of the gut and pancreas and their putative function were provided by Heidenhain, Langerhans, Laguesse and Sharpey-Schafer. Despite the dominant 19th century concept of nervism (Pavlov), in 1902, Starling and Bayliss using Hardy's term 'hormonos' described secretin and in so doing, established the gut as an endocrine organ. Thus, nervism was supplanted by hormonal regulation of function and thereafter numerous bioactive gut peptides and amines were identified. At virtually the same time (1892), Ramón y Cajal of Madrid reported the existence of a group of specialized intestinal cells that he referred to as 'interstitial cells'. Cajal postulated that they might function as an interface between the neural system and the smooth muscles of the gut. Some 22 years later, Keith suggested that their function might be analogous to the electroconductive system of the heart and proposed their role as components of an intestinal pacemaker system. This prescient hypothesis was subsequently confirmed in 1982 by Thuneberg and a decade later Maede identified c-Kit as a critical molecular regulator in the development and function of the interstitial cells of Cajal and further confirmed the commonality of neural and endocrine cells. The additional characterization of the endocrine regulatory system of the GI tract was implemented when Feyrter (1938) using Masson's staining techniques, identified 'helle Zellen' within the pancreatic ductal system and the intestinal epithelium and proposed the concept of a diffuse neuroendocrine system. Pearse subsequently grouped the various cells belonging to that system under the rubric of a unifying APUD series. Currently, the gut neuroendocrine system is viewed as a syncytium of neural and endocrine cells sharing a common cell lineage whose phenotypic regulation is as yet unclear. Their key role in the regulation of gastrointestinal function is, however, indubitable.

APUD Cells↗
PubMed2004

Immunohistochemical and electron-microscopic identification of neuroendocrine cells in the stomach of uremic rats.

Many disturbances in electrolyte and hormonal balance in the body induced by functional impairment of renal parenchyma may affect the activity of amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation (APUD) cells, which constitute a very important link in the regulation of homeostasis. The aim of the present study was the morphological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural estimation of enteroendocrine cells in the stomach of uremic rats. Fragments of gastric pylorus were collected 1, 2 and 4 weeks after nephrectomy. Paraffin embedded sections were stained with H + E and by silver impregnation. For identification of neuroendocrine cells, immunohistochemical reactions were performed using specific antibodies against somatostatin, synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase and anti-calcitonin gene related peptide. The analysis showed an increased number of APUD cells in the stomach of uremic rats compared to control rats, which may be a morphological expression of their hyperfunction in the functional impairment of renal parenchyma. These results suggest that chronic renal failure can modulate the secretory processes of APUD cells.

APUD Cells↗
PubMed2004

Immunohistochemical and electron-microscopical identification of neuroendocrine cells in the respiratory tract of rats with experimental uraemia.

The aim of the present study was to characterise immunohistochemically and ultrastructurally the neuroendocrine cells in the pulmonary systems of uraemic rats. Pieces of lung and trachea were collected 1, 2 and 4 weeks after nephrectomy. Paraffin-embedded sections were stained with H+E and by silver impregnation. For the identification of neuroendocrine cells immunohistochemical reactions were performed with the use of specific antibodies against calcitonin (CT), somatostatin (SOM), synaptophysin (SYN), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). For electron microscopy, ultrathin sections were used. The analysis showed an increased number of both the solitary neuroendocrine cells and of neuroepithelial bodies in uraemic rats when compared to control animals.

APUD Cells↗