PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8674375

Postpolypectomy colonic hemorrhage.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the incidence, diagnostic methods, and treatment of hemorrhage occurring after colonoscopic polypectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 12,058 patients who underwent colonoscopy at an academic referral center between January 1989 and July 1993. Of these, 6,365 patients required polypectomies or biopsies. RESULTS: After these procedures, 13 patients (0.2 percent) developed lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage requiring hospitalization. All bleeding episodes occurred within 12 days of polypectomy or biopsy (mean = 8 days). Twelve patients (92 percent) underwent technetium-tagged red blood cell scintigraphy, which localized bleeding in four patients (31 percent). In the eight patients with normal scintigrams, hemorrhage did not recur, and no further evaluation was performed. Five patients (38 percent) underwent arteriography. Arteriogram was positive in two of four patients with positive scintigrams, and bleeding was controlled with selective vasopressin infusion. The fifth patient had arteriography without prior diagnostic studies because of massive hemorrhage; the bleeding site was identified and controlled with selective vasopressin infusion. Three patients had lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, with endoscopic identification of bleeding site in two patients, and endoscopic electrocautery controlled the bleeding in one patient. In the 13 patients with hemorrhage, cessation of bleeding occurred with intestinal rest and hydration in nine patients (69 percent), selective vasopressin infusion in three patients (23 percent), and endoscopic electrocautery in one patient (8 percent). Eight patients (62 percent) required blood transfusion with a mean of 4.8 units (excluding one patient on warfarin sodium who required 14 units of blood). No patient required surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of hemorrhage after colonoscopic polypectomy or biopsy is low, and in our series, hemorrhage resolved without the need for surgical intervention. Management includes initial stabilization followed by diagnostic evaluation. Technetium-tagged red blood cell nuclear scintigraphy identifies ongoing bleeding and identifies patients in whom additional invasive procedures (arteriography lower gastrointestinal tract endoscopy) are warranted.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D H Gibbs, F G Opelka, D E Beck, T C Hicks, A E Timmcke, J B Gathright. 1996. Postpolypectomy colonic hemorrhage.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02054448

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The small polyp at flexible sigmoidoscopy: an historical perspective on why practices still vary.

Current practices vary regarding the approach to small polyps discovered during screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. The most common practice is to perform colonoscopy whenever any adenoma is detected, a strategy that generally uses biopsy of polyps < or = 5 mm in size. However, data suggest that tubular adenomas < 1 cm in size in the distal colon have less predictive value than other distal adenomas for advanced adenomas in the proximal colon. Thus, some centers reserve colonoscopy for distal adenomas with tubulovillous or villous histology, > 1 cm in size, or with high-grade dysplasia. At the other end of the spectrum, another school of thought advocates screening colonoscopy, recognizing that most patients with advanced proximal adenomas do not have polyps in their distal colon. Advocates of this approach use any excuse to perform colonoscopy, whether it be a positive fecal occult blood test, minor symptoms, or small polyp at flexible sigmoidoscopy, even if hyperplastic. This review describes the history of the controversy regarding management of findings at flexible sigmoidoscopy, the data pertinent to the controversy, and the basis for the three approaches described above, all of which are currently within the standard of medical care.

Colonic Polyps

[Virtual colonoscopy using CT and MRI].

PURPOSE: To evaluate experimentally and in patients the sensitivity and effective dose of virtual electron-beam tomography (EBT) colonoscopy for detecting small colon tumors and to compare the methods and results with virtual colonoscopy using spiral CT and MR imaging in a review of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six polyps with diameters between 3 and 12 mm were created and randomly placed in resected pig colon. After distension with air, the pig colon was scanned with continuous volume scanning (CVS, 3 mm collimation) and a pitch of 0.4, 0.8 and 1.5. Twenty patients positive for the fecal blood test were examined after rectal CO2 insufflation and i.v. administration of 1 mg glucagon. A 13 s CVS scan was used to cover the entire colon within one breath-hold. 3D volume-rendered fly-throughs were evaluated by two independent radiologists. Effective dose equivalent was estimated using an Alderson phantom equipped with thermoluminescence dosimeters. RESULTS: In the tumor model, all polyps were detectable at a pitch of 1.5. A further reduction of the pitch ratio did not improve the conspicuity of the polyps. In patient studies, all tumors (n = 4) and polyps (n = 3) were correctly identified on 3D fly-throughs. Two false positive results were obtained. Effective dose equivalent was calculated at 3.2 mSv per scan. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results indicate that virtual EBT colonoscopy holds promise for fast screening for colon polyps. The best technique for virtual colonoscopy (Spiral CT, EBT, MRI) has not yet been determined and the future role of virtual colonoscopy must still be defined.

Colonic Polyps