PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8690700

Compliance issues in primary care.

Abstract

Primary care medical practice is a broadly based medical discipline, emphasizing continuity of care in both sickness and health and effective doctor/patient communication and involving the patient as a partner in the provision of health care services. Against this background, there is troubling evidence that psychosocial (mental health) problems are not being adequately diagnosed and treated by physicians in general, and primary care practitioners in particular. This deficiency is the first step down the road to poor compliance. This author assumes that a goodly portion of the blame can be laid on the doorstep of the medical education establishment with its emphasis on the biomedical, reductionism, and high-tech tertiary care. Physicians exit the educational system with a predisposition to deal with problems from a biomedical perspective. They are unaware that, by the very nature of the doctor/patient relationship, they possess considerable ability to effectively intervene in the psychosocial area. Suggestions are given as to how primary care practitioners can improve on this dimension of their medical practice and deal with psychosocial issues. Available evidence would indicate that effectively dealing with these issues will improve patient compliance and outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Lieberman. 1996. Compliance issues in primary care.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8690700/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗