PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8711289

[Physicians and politics].

Abstract

In addition to their original healing-mission, physicians gain more and more responsibility in health politics including most important aspects like education and medical ethics. Recent developments and possibilities in prenatal diagnostics, molecular biology and in-vitro-fertilization demand clearcut positions from the medical staff. Political evaluation of costs in health care systems concerns analysis of the most common factors responsible for the increasing costs. High expectations and demands of the patients are one reason, other are excessive use of new technologies, increase of the aged in the population and growing cost for liability cases. Mechanisms for the down-regulation of costs are restricted. The so called free market in health care such as premium-competition of health insurance point out more theoretical than practical aspects. The Health insurance law (KVG) by increasing the extent of services has contributed to a further increase of costs instead of lowering them. Shifting from hospitalization to out-patient treatment and reducing beds for acute services could lower hospital costs further. AIDS, Drug-politics and environmental destruction, three actual plagues, represent further political challenges for physicians. For the future a reasonable politic involving a better motivated medical corps has to be promoted. To this end first personal structures should be strengthened by help of new ethical view points. Future medicine should be complex, patient-oriented-and remain affordable. Therefore medical responsibility in political development is mandatory.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A F Schärli. 1996-06-18. [Physicians and politics].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8711289/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗