PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8712120

Comparison of enalapril versus nifedipine to decrease left ventricular hypertrophy in systemic hypertension (the PRESERVE trial).

Abstract

The PRESERVE (Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement) study is designed to provide a definitive test of the ability of enalapril to achieve greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than nifedipine GITs (gastrointestinal treatment system) by a degree that would be prognostically meaningful on a population basis (10 g/m2). To achieve this goal, an ethnically diverse population of 480 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass of screening echocardiography will be enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6 and 12 months' randomized therapy. Blinded readings of echocardiograms at a central laboratory will provide systematic information about treatment effects on LV structure, wall motion, and Doppler blood flow. The study power is at least 90% to test the primary hypotheses that enalapril will induce greater normalization of LV mass and diastolic filling than nifedipine. After the 1-year echocardiographic trial, the study population will be followed 3 more years to test the hypothesis that a reduction in LV mass, independent of blood pressure lowering, is associated with a reduction in the risk of morbid and fatal cardiovascular events.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R B Devereux, B Dahlof, D Levy, M A Pfeffer. 1996-07-01. Comparison of enalapril versus nifedipine to decrease left ventricular hypertrophy in systemic hypertension (the PRESERVE trial).. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00228-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Meta-analysis of the long-term effect of nifedipine for pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertensive disorders generally result in a progressively worsening course associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Nifedipine therapy may provide an effective solution to attenuate the disease state. OBJECTIVE: To assess the magnitude and consistency of the effect of nifedipine on reducing pulmonary artery pressure in patients with pulmonary hypertensive disorders. DESIGN: A meta-analysis of 8 trials of nifedipine therapy. METHODS: Clinical trials were identified by a computerized literature search of MEDLINE and by an assessment of bibliographies of retrieved studies. Trials were selected if they measured the change in pulmonary artery pressures in their subjects after weeks to months of therapy. Eight of 25 conducted trials were selected for review. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 6 homogeneous trials demonstrated a significant decrease in pulmonary artery pressure: -7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -3 to -11 mm Hg; P < .01). Heterogeneity of trial results appeared to be due to differences in the severity of initial pulmonary artery pressures and to differences in the dosage of nifedipine rather than the type of disease state. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of the trials of nifedipine therapy in patients with pulmonary hypertension demonstrated a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure that was associated with an amelioration of clinical symptoms. Because of the paucity of data, however, larger trials are needed to better define its clinical value.

Antihypertensive Agents