PubMed · 8716535
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P Birchenall. 1996. Learning disabilities nursing: developing new horizons.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0260-6917(96)80061-x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Economic forces have stimulated a growing role for physician "hospitalists" in caring for patients hospitalized by other physicians, and the question of whether hospital care constitutes a new medical specialty has been raised. Three recently recognized specialties--emergency medicine, family practice, and critical care--originated from trends in medical practice. All three fulfill the major criteria for a medical specialty: scientific legitimacy, the development of new training pathways, and the existence of academic departments. The hospitalist movement is currently underdeveloped in each of these areas. By training, most hospitalists are internists who are well prepared to care for inpatients. Internal medicine must determine how this new movement fits into the traditional framework of general internal medicine and medical subspecialties. Until it does, the future of inpatient medicine as a recognized specialty will remain uncertain.
The hospital-based generalist physician is a recent organizational innovation in health care in the United States. Does the hospitalist model provide improved health care? The answer to this question lies in a rigorous evaluation of the hospitalist system in the clinical setting. This paper describes key outcomes that need to be assessed and methodologic issues that need to be addressed when conducting and interpreting the results of evaluations of the hospitalist model. To provide evidence about the value of the hospitalist model, quality of care should be evaluated through the measurement of both processes and outcomes. The clinical processes assessed may include diagnostic tests and treatments that are causally linked with outcomes. A variety of outcomes can be measured, such as death, clinical or physiologic status, physical function, and psychological well-being. The analysis of resource use data can aid in an assessment of the relative costs and effectiveness of clinical services. An evaluation of the hospitalist model requires an adequate research design, which should include a precise definition of the model being studied, the selection of an appropriate comparison group, the collection of clinical and demographic information on patients, the specification of both process and outcome measures, and the use of statistical techniques that are appropriate to the questions being asked and the data being collected. The design must distinguish between outcomes attributable to the introduction of hospitalists and those attributable to other changes in medical treatments and the organization of care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.