PubMed · 8716568
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J G Somerville. 1996. Outcome-based practice: convince me!. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8716568/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The purpose of this study was to compare performance measurements to evaluate the effects of clinical pathway implementation on improving practice performances in urology. Since April 1997, a total of 18 clinical pathways have been created in the urology department. Of these clinical pathways, six were implemented for endoscopic surgery, and four and eight were for minor and major surgery, respectively. Eight prominent performance measurements, which were identified as representative indicators of the practice performances, were selected in endoscopic surgery, five in minor surgery, and 11 in major surgery. Between April 1997 and March 1999, 2,883 consecutive patients, who underwent endoscopic surgery, minor surgery, and major surgery, were evaluated herein. The treatment results for patients in the first and second years of clinical pathway implementation were compared to those from the year preceding the implementation. In endoscopic surgery, five of the eight performance measurements improved significantly in the first year of implementation. Notably, three of the five improved performances continued to improve in the second year. Similarly, in minor surgery, four of the five performance measurements improved significantly following 2 years. Finally, in major urological surgery, six of the 11 performance measurements also improved significantly after 1 year; four of which continued to improve during the second year. Therefore, we conclude that patient care, which is based on the implementation of clinical pathways, can improve practice performances and facilitate medical care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
AIMS: To obtain an overall picture of the organisation of acute stroke management in hospitals throughout New Zealand. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all New Zealand hospitals. The survey included questions about access to organised stroke care, the presence of designated areas for stroke patient management, guidelines for stroke management and audit. RESULTS: Responses were received from all hospitals surveyed, with 41 admitting stroke patients acutely. Five hospitals (four regional and one large urban) had organised inpatient care. Five hospitals (three regional and two large urban) had stroke physicians. Only 40-60% of the New Zealand population had access to hospitals with guidelines for the management of complications following stroke or secondary prevention. Only fifteen of 41 hospitals had audited local stroke care. There were few differences in the management of stroke patients between urban and regional centres, but care in some regional hospitals was 'better' than that in most large urban hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The development of an organised approach to inpatient stroke care in New Zealand and the training of general physcians, geriatricans and neurologists in stroke medicine must be seen as a priority.