PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8729892

Aprotinin.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical pharmacology of aprotinin in patients undergoing surgical procedures involving major blood loss, namely, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was used to identify French- and English-language publications on aprotinin using the indexing terms aprotinin, cardiothoracic surgery, and hemorrhage. The MEDLINE search was supplemented by review of article bibliographies. Data also were obtained from the approved Canadian and US product labels. STUDY SELECTIONS: All abstracts and uncontrolled and controlled clinical trials were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design, population, results, and safety information were retained. Efficacy conclusions were drawn from controlled trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor isolated from bovine lung tissue, decreases bleeding after cardiac surgery by mechanisms including antifibrinolytic activity and preservation of platelet function. Several trials have shown that aprotinin reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing CABG. Its use in other surgical procedures involving major blood loss has been reported. Aprotinin is well tolerated, with minor allergic reactions being the most frequently reported adverse effect. Although unsubstantiated, the possibility that aprotinin could create a prothrombic state leading to early graft occlusion and formation of microthrombi in renal and coronary vasculatures is of concern. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin is an effective hemostatic agent in CABG. Clear definitions of indications, dosing, safety, and repeated use remain to be investigated thoroughly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Robert, B K Wagner, M Boulanger, M Richer. 1996. Aprotinin.. https://doi.org/10.1177/106002809603000410

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Functional properties of the two redox-active sites in yeast protein disulphide isomerase in vitro and in vivo.

Protein folding catalysed by protein disulphide isomerase (PDI) has been studied both in vivo and in vitro using different assays. PDI contains a CGHC active site in each of its two catalytic domains (a and a'). The relative importance of each active site in PDI from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yPDI) has been analysed by exchanging the active-site cysteine residues for serine residues. The activity of the mutant forms of yPDI was determined quantitatively by following the refolding of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in vitro. In this assay the activity of the wild-type yPDI is quite similar to that of human PDI, both in rearrangement and oxidation reactions. However, while the a domain active site of the human enzyme is more active than the a'-site, the reverse is the case for yPDI. This prompted us to set up an assay to investigate whether the situation would be different with a native yeast substrate, procarboxypeptidase Y. In this assay, however, the a' domain active site also appeared to be much more potent than the a-site. These results were unexpected, not only because of the difference with human PDI, but also because analysis of folding of procarboxypeptidase Y in vivo had shown the a-site to be most important. We furthermore show that the apparent difference between in vivo and in vitro activities is not due to catalytic contributions from the other PDI homologues found in yeast.

Aprotinin

'High dose' aprotinin and heparin-coated circuits: clinical efficacy and inflammatory response.

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, improve biocompatibility and may protect the postoperative hemostasic mechanisms in routine coronary bypass operations. 'High-dose' aprotinin reduces bloodloss, transfusion needs, and re-explorations as a result of bleeding, and may have an additional role in reducing the inflammatory response of the body to cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. It has not been established, however, if the addition of a heparin-coated circuit to the intraoperative administration of 'high dose' aprotinin further reduces the whole-body inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and improves the postoperative clinical course of the patients who are undergoing coronary surgery. Thirty patients undergoing primary elective coronary artery bypass grafting were studied. All the patients received, intraoperatively, the serine-protease inhibitor aprotinin according to the 'Hammersmith' protocol and full heparin dose. Patients were randomly allocated to be treated either with a circuit completely coated with surface-bound heparin (n = 15) or with an uncoated, but otherwise identical, circuit (n = 15). Differences in the clinical course of the two groups of patients, as well as differences in the behavior of hematological and inflammatory (interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein) factors before, during and after bypass, were analyzed. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of bleeding and transfusional requirements, the time spent on a ventilator, or in duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). In all patients, a significant increase in the total white blood cell count, neutrophils, serum IL-6 and C-reactive protein occurred in relation to cardiopulmonary bypass. This was not influenced by heparin precoating of the circuit. In addition, there was an increase in the monocyte count during follow-up, and there was a trend towards higher monocyte counts in the patients who were treated with heparin-coated circuits. These results suggest that the addition of a heparin-coated circuit to the intraoperative 'high-dose' aprotinin therapy probably had little influence on the clinical course and on the time-course of the inflammatory parameters of the adult patients undergoing primary coronary surgery with a full heparinization protocol.

Aprotinin

Aprotinin: an update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in open heart surgery and coronary artery bypass surgery.

UNLABELLED: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with defective haemostasis which results in bleeding and the requirement for allogenic blood product transfusions in many patients undergoing open heart surgery (OHS) and/or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with CPB. Conservation of blood has become a priority during surgery because of shortages of donor blood, the risks associated with the use of allogenic blood products and the costs of these products. Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor isolated from bovine lung tissue which acts in a number of interrelated ways to provide an antifibrinolytic effect, inhibit contact activation, reduce platelet dysfunction and attenuate the inflammatory response to CPB. It is used to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients with a risk of haemorrhage and has clear advantages over placebo or no treatment. High dose aprotinin significantly reduces postoperative blood loss compared with aminocaproic acid and desmopressin, and decreases transfusion requirements compared with desmopressin. Results are less consistent with tranexamic acid: high dose aprotinin either reduces blood loss significantly more than, or to an equivalent level to, tranexamic acid. A variety of other lower aprotinin dosage regimens consistently result in similar reductions in blood loss to aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid. Data from clinical trials indicate that aprotinin is generally well tolerated, and the adverse events seen are those expected in patients undergoing OHS and/or CABG with CPB. Hypersensitivity reactions occur in <0.1 to 0.6% of patients receiving aprotinin for the first time. The results of original reports indicating that aprotinin therapy may increase myocardial infarction rates or mortality have not been supported by more recent studies specifically designed to investigate this outcome. However, a tendency to early vein graft occlusion with aprotinin has been shown and care with anticoagulation and vessel grafts is required. No comparative tolerability data between aprotinin and the lysine analogues, aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid, are available. CONCLUSION: Comparative tolerability and cost-effectiveness data for aprotinin and the lysine analogues are required to more fully assess their individual roles in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing CPB during OHS and/or CABG. However, clinical evidence to date supports the use of aprotinin over its competitors in patients at high risk of haemorrhage, in those for whom transfusion is unavailable or in patients who refuse allogenic transfusions.

Aprotinin