PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8740564

Why toxins!

Abstract

Toxins are potent cytotoxic proteins which gain access to the interior of mammalian cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis. However, the trafficking pathways within mammalian cells are complex and toxins must be processed to active forms while avoiding degradation by the lysosomal system. Once delivered to an appropriate intracellular location, the active toxin fragment translocates to the cell cytosol and inhibits protein synthesis. Chimeric toxins are constructed by removing the toxins natural binding domain and replacing it with an antibody or cell-binding ligand that redirects cell killing activity to cancer cells. Gaining an understanding of how toxins manoeuvre within cells is vital for improving the effectiveness of chimeric toxins.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Fitzgerald. 1996. Why toxins!. https://doi.org/10.1006/scbi.1996.0013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clostridium perfringens iota toxin: characterization of the cell-associated iota b complex.

Clostridium perfringens type E iota toxin consists of two unlinked proteins designated as iota a (Ia; molecular mass approximately 47 kDa), an ADP-ribosyltransferase and iota b (Ib; molecular mass approximately 81 kDa) which binds to the cell surface and facilitates Ia entry into the cytosol. By Western-blot analysis, Ib incubated with Vero cells at 37 degrees C generated a cell-associated, SDS-insoluble oligomer of Ib (molecular mass>220 kDa) within 15 s, which was still evident 110 min after washing cells. Ib oligomerization was temperature, but not pH, dependent and was facilitated by a cell-surface protein(s). Within 5 min at 37 degrees C, cell-bound Ib generated Na(+)/K(+) permeable channels that were blocked by Ia. However, Ib-induced channels or oligomers were not formed at 4 degrees C. Two monoclonal antibodies raised against Ib that recognize unique, neutralizing epitopes within residues 632-655 either inhibited Ib binding to cells and/or oligomerization, unlike a non-neutralizing monoclonal antibody that binds within Ib residues 28-66. The Ib protoxin (molecular mass approximately 98 kDa), which does not facilitate iota cytotoxicity but binds to Vero cells, did not oligomerize or form ion-permeable channels on cells, and neither trypsin nor chymotrypsin treatment of cell-bound Ib protoxin induced large complex formation. The link between Ib oligomers and iota toxicity was also apparent with a resistant cell line (MRC-5), which bound to Ib with no evidence of oligomerization. Overall, these studies revealed that the biological activity of iota toxin is dependent on a long-lived, cell-associated Ib complex that rapidly forms ion-permeable channels in cell membranes. These results further reveal the similarities of C. perfringens iota toxin with other bacterial binary toxins produced by Bacillus anthracis and C. botulinum.

ADP Ribose Transferases↗

Exoenzyme S shows selective ADP-ribosylation and GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activities towards small GTPases in vivo.

Intracellular targeting of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxins exoenzyme S (ExoS) and exoenzyme T (ExoT) initially results in disruption of the actin microfilament structure of eukaryotic cells. ExoS and ExoT are bifunctional cytotoxins, with N-terminal GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and C-terminal ADP-ribosyltransferase activities. We show that ExoS can modify multiple GTPases of the Ras superfamily in vivo. In contrast, ExoT shows no ADP-ribosylation activity towards any of the GTPases tested in vivo. We further examined ExoS targets in vivo and observed that ExoS modulates the activity of several of these small GTP-binding proteins, such as Ras, Rap1, Rap2, Ral, Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42. We suggest that ExoS is the major ADP-ribosyltransferase protein modulating small GTPase function encoded by P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, we show that the GAP activity of ExoS abrogates the activation of RhoA, Cdc42 and Rap1.

ADP Ribose Transferases↗

A re-evaluation of the role of histidine-426 within Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A.

CRM66 (cross-reactive 66 kDa protein) is an inactive mutant form of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A that has been isolated from a mutant strain of P. aeruginosa derived from nitrosoguanidine-based mutagenesis. The mutation within this enzyme toxin was previously identified as H426Y and it was shown to possess significantly reduced enzymic activity. Furthermore, it was previously suggested that His-426 may directly participate in the catalytic mechanism of the exotoxin A enzyme and that it may also play an important role in the binding of the protein substrate of exotoxin A, a critical protein factor in eukaryotic protein translation known as elongation factor-2. In order to more thoroughly characterize the role of His-426 in the enzyme mechanism of exotoxin A, amino acid substitutions were made within helix 1 of the enzyme domain in the vicinity of the His-426 residue. Analysis of the site-directed mutagenesis results involving kinetic and protein structural integrity measurements revealed that His-426 H-bonds to Tyr-502 and that replacement of His-426 with polar substitutions leads to structural alterations of the enzyme's folded conformation. Furthermore, it was shown that His-426 is not important for the binding of either of the two substrates of exotoxin A, NAD(+) or elongation factor-2. In summary, these data show that His-426 is not an active-site residue and that it is not important for substrate binding or orientation, but that it plays an important structural role in helping to maintain the folded conformation of the enzyme toxin. Therefore, the role of His-426 would seem to be to tether helix 1 to the main body of the enzyme, and mutations resulting in the disruption of this region of the enzyme result in a significantly impaired enzyme.

ADP Ribose Transferases↗