PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8747181

Object segmentation and visual neglect.

Abstract

A major development in recent research on human visual attention has been the increasing interplay between research on normal attentional mechanisms, and accounts of unilateral neglect and extinction after brain-damage in terms of damage to these mechanisms. Although there are potential pitfalls in this approach, it has already proved useful. This is illustrated for the debate over whether segmentation processes precede spatial attention in vision. This debate began in the normal literature, but has since motivated several studies of visual neglect and extinction. These reveal that various segmentation processes can influence which region of a scene will be neglected or extinguished, implying that grouping may precede the abnormal bias in spatial attention, and showing that considerable residual processing can take place in the neglected or extinguished visual field. The extent of this residual processing is tentatively related to emerging anatomical data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Driver. 1995. Object segmentation and visual neglect.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(95)00044-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Attentional requirements in a 'preattentive' feature search task.

It is commonly assumed that certain features are so elementary to the visual system that they require no attentional resources to be perceived. Such 'preattentive' features are traditionally identified by visual search performance, in which the reaction time for detecting a feature difference against a set of distractor items does not increase with the number of distractors. This suggests an unlimited capacity for the perception of such features. We provide evidence to the contrary, demonstrating that detection of differences in a simple feature such as orientation is severely impaired by additionally imposing an attentionally demanding rapid serial visual presentation task involving letter identification. The same visual stimuli exhibit non-increasing reaction time versus set-size functions. These results demonstrate that attention can be critical even for the detection of so-called 'preattentive' features.

Attention

Are subjects' perceptual asymmetries on auditory and visual language tasks correlated?: a meta-analysis.

A number of studies have investigated the correlation between subjects' perceptual asymmetries on auditory and visual language tasks. With few exceptions, these studies have found low, nonsignificant correlations between the two types of perceptual asymmetries. However, variations in subjects' perceptual asymmetries on these tasks reflect not only individual differences in language lateralization but also several extraneous variables (e.g., random errors, individual differences in left-right attentional biases). Thus, low correlations between the two types of asymmetries may reflect "masking" by these extraneous variables rather than a "true" cross-modal dissociation. Consistent with this view, a meta-analysis of prior studies revealed a small, but significant correlation between the two types of asymmetries for left-handers. The correlation was nonsignificant for right-handers, presumably reflecting stronger attenuation caused by limited variability in language lateralization in this group. Possible factors mediating significant correlations between the two types of perceptual asymmetries include certain language processes shared by the two types of tasks, cross-modal consistency in individual differences in lateralization of certain modality-specific language processes, and cross-modal consistency in individual differences in left-right attentional biases.

Attention