PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8749354

Subtalar joint dislocations.

D R Bohay·A Manoli
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dislocations of the subtalar joint are rare injuries. The anatomy, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis of subtalar joint dislocations have been well described in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to review the current literature on subtalar joint dislocations, as well as outline those aspects of the anatomy, pathomechanics, and treatment pertinent to care of the patient with subtalar joint dislocation. In addition, complications and obstacles to reduction are described. Subtalar joint dislocations, although not common, have increased in frequency over the last decade. Generally, they can be treated successfully with closed reduction and a short period of cast immobilization. The majority of patients will suffer some disability with subtalar joint stiffness the primary complaint. Associated intra-articular fractures increase the risk of posttraumatic arthrosis.

Explore related subjects

Biomechanical PhenomenaFollow-Up StudiesFoot InjuriesHumansJoint DislocationsManipulation, OrthopedicSubtalar JointTreatment OutcomeJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D R Bohay, A Manoli. 1995. Subtalar joint dislocations.. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079501601212

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Mechanical evaluation of cross-link designs in rigid pedicle screw systems.

STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed to evaluate the biomechanical performance of 5 different cross-link brands to determine which design characteristics are biomechanically desirable. METHODS: The Cotrel-Dubousset, Isola, Puno Winter Byrd, Rogozinski, and Texas Scottish Rite Hospital systems were assembled to vertebral models according to the manufacturer's specifications. Three constructs were tested for each brand of instrumentation: without cross-links, with one cross-link, and with two cross-links. Four modes of loading: axial, torsional, flexion-extension, and lateral-flexion were used. Load-displacement curves were plotted. The stiffness was calculated from the slope of these curves. OBJECTIVES: Five different rigid pedicle screw systems were tested to determine: 1) what are the characteristics of cross-link design that are most effective in limiting torsional motion; 2) whether two cross-links are more effective than one; and 3) whether cross-linkage increases the construct stiffness in lateral bending. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cross-linkage has been shown to increase the torsional stiffness of rod and screw constructs. Increased construct stiffness has been correlated with higher fusion rates. RESULTS: Increases in axial, flexion-extension, or lateral-flexion stiffness, with the addition of one or two cross-links, were not statistically significant. In torsional loading, increases in stiffness within brands were statistically significant in every case. The average increase was 44% with one added cross-link and 26% with two. The magnitude of the increase in torsional stiffness was compared with the cross-sectional area of the respective cross-link. Greater stiffness correlated with larger cross-sectional area (r = 0.81 for one cross-link, and r = 0.60 for two). CONCLUSION: The use of cross-linkage in spinal fusion increases torsional stiffness in pedicle screw and hook constructs. This study 1) confirmed the effectiveness of cross-linkage in limiting torsional motion and showed the superiority of two cross-links to one cross-link in limiting torsional motion, 2) showed that increase of torsional stiffness of a cross-linked construct is proportional to the cross-sectional area of the cross-link, and 3) demonstrated that cross-links do not increases stiffness in the lateral flexion mode.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1997

Offset laminar hooks decrease bending moments of pedicle screws during in situ contouring.

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study was conducted using cadaver spines to determine the influence of supplemental offset laminar hooks on pedicle screw bending moments and migration during in situ contouring of short-segment pedicle instrumentation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of offset laminar hooks on short-segment pedicle instrumentation constructs during in situ contouring. It was hypothesized that the screw bending moments and screw migration would decrease when offset laminar hooks were used with short-segment pedicle instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies have implicated screw bending or breakage at the screw hub as failure mechanisms in short-segment pedicle instrumentation constructs used to stabilize thoracolumbar fractures, particularly when rods are contoured in situ. METHODS: Cadaver spines were instrumented using short-segment pedicle instrumentation or short-segment pedicle instrumentation with supplemental offset laminar hooks. The instrumentation was contoured in situ, and screw bending moments were measured at the hub of the screws. Screw migration was measured from lateral radiographs. Comparisons of screw bending moments and migration were made between the two instrumentation configurations. RESULTS: The addition of offset laminar hooks significantly reduced screw bending moments and screw migration during in situ contouring. The mean screw bending moments decreased approximately 30% at the maximum bending angle of 30 degrees (P < 0.05), and the mean screw migration during contouring decreased from 8 degrees to 2 degrees (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of offset laminar hooks to short-segment pedicle instrumentation decreases screw bending moments and migration of the screws during in situ contouring of the rod. The authors speculate that decrease in loading of the screw will improve durability of the constructs clinically.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1997

The effect of pedicle morphometry on pedicle screw loading. A synthetic model.

STUDY DESIGN: Static nondestructive bending analysis of pedicle screws inserted into vertebral analogues was conducted. Pedicle screw bending load was studied as a function of pedicle morphometry. OBJECTIVES: To determine how sagittal bending moment in pedicle screws is affected by changes in pedicle height, length, and width. BACKGROUND DATA: An unexpectedly high rate of clinical failure has been observed in pedicle screws used in short-segment instrumentation for axially unstable fractures. The majority of screws fail in sagittal bending within the pedicle. To date, little is known of the exogenous factors that affect in situ loads incurred by pedicle screws. METHODS: Synthetic vertebral analogues were fabricated, varying pedicle height, length, or width independently. Pedicle screws internally instrumented with strain gages were used as load transducers to determine screw bending moments within the pedicle and body of the analogue. Analogues were loaded in compression to simulate loading of an unstable burst fracture. RESULTS: Screw bending moments within the pedicle increased incrementally with increasing pedicle length, rising 30% as length increased from 8.0 mm to 12.0 mm. Screw moment increased 20% when pedicle height dropped below 15.0 mm, consistent with a threshold effect. Changes in pedicle width did not affect screw loads within the pedicle. CONCLUSIONS: In situ pedicle screw loads increased significantly as pedicle length increased and as pedicle height decreased. Pedicle screws instrumented internally with strain gages are an effective research instrument allowing measurement of in situ loading along the axis of the screw.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗