PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8760338

DNA elements responsive to auxin.

Abstract

Genes induced by the plant hormone auxin are probably involved in the execution of vital cellular functions and developmental processes. Experimental approaches designed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of auxin action have focused on auxin perception, genetic dissection of the signaling apparatus and specific gene activation. Auxin-responsive promoter elements of early genes provide molecular tools for probing auxin signaling in reverse. Functional analysis of several auxin-specific promoters of unrelated early genes suggests combinatorial utilization of both conserved and variable elements. These elements are arranged into autonomous domains and the combination of such modules generates uniquely composed promoters. Modular promoters allow for auxin-mediated transcriptional responses to be revealed in a tissue- and development-specific manner.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Abel, N Ballas, L M Wong, A Theologis. 1996. DNA elements responsive to auxin.. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950180808

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

miR-503-3p promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer by directly targeting SMAD2 and E-cadherin.

Although progress in clinical and basic research has significantly increased our understanding of breast cancer, little is known about the molecular mechanism underlying breast cancer metastasis. Identification of effective therapeutic targets to prevent breast cancer metastasis is urgently needed. The function of miR-503-3p has been investigated in other cancers, but its role in breast cancer remains undefined. Here, we found that miR-503-3p was overexpressed in breast cancer tissue and plasma compared with adjacent normal breast tissue and with plasma from healthy individuals. Moreover, we identified miR-503-3p to be an oncogene of breast cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Upregulation of miR-503-3p in breast cancer cells inhibited expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related protein SMAD2 and the epithelial marker protein E-cadherin by directly binding to their mRNA 3' untranslated region, whereas increased expression of mesenchymal marker proteins, including vimentin and N-cadherin. Taken together, our findings support a critical role for miR-503-3p in induction of breast cancer EMT and suggest that plasma miR-503-3p may be a useful diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer.

Base Sequence

Identification and characterization of Prp45p and Prp46p, essential pre-mRNA splicing factors.

Through exhaustive two-hybrid screens using a budding yeast genomic library, and starting with the splicing factor and DEAH-box RNA helicase Prp22p as bait, we identified yeast Prp45p and Prp46p. We show that as well as interacting in two-hybrid screens, Prp45p and Prp46p interact with each other in vitro. We demonstrate that Prp45p and Prp46p are spliceosome associated throughout the splicing process and both are essential for pre-mRNA splicing. Under nonsplicing conditions they also associate in coprecipitation assays with low levels of the U2, U5, and U6 snRNAs that may indicate their presence in endogenous activated spliceosomes or in a postsplicing snRNP complex.

Base Sequence

Using sequence logos and information analysis of Lrp DNA binding sites to investigate discrepancies between natural selection and SELEX.

In vitro experiments that characterize DNA-protein interactions by artificial selection, such as SELEX,are often performed with the assumption that the experimental conditions are equivalent to natural ones. To test whether SELEX gives natural results, we compared sequence logos composed from naturally occurring leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) binding sites with those composed from SELEX-generated binding sites. The sequence logos were significantly different, indicating that the binding conditions are disparate. A likely explanation is that the SELEX experiment selected for a dimeric or trimeric Lrp complex bound to DNA. In contrast, natural sites appear to be bound by a monomer. This discrepancy suggests that in vitro selections do not necessarily give binding site sets comparable with the natural binding sites.

Base Sequence