PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8762717

Differences between stereopsis, interocular correlation and binocularity.

M S Livingstone
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In normal human subjects, evoked potentials in response to depth reversing two-color dynamic random-dot stereograms disappeared or were greatly reduced at equiluminance, whereas responses to shifts between patterns that were correlated and anticorrelated (for the two eyes) were, for most subjects, actually larger at equiluminance than at non-equiluminance. Responses were only slightly diminished at equiluminance to similar texture-shifting patterns that were identical to the two eyes. These results suggest that a significant fraction of cells with input from both eyes can respond to correlation/anticorrelation shifts, yet are not involved in stereopsis. Also, binocular rivalry may gate the responses of these binocular-nonstereoscopic units.

Explore related subjects

Depth PerceptionEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansLightPattern Recognition, VisualVision, BinocularJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M S Livingstone. 1996. Differences between stereopsis, interocular correlation and binocularity.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00175-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Discrimination of the spatial derivatives of horizontal binocular disparity.

Observers discriminated the relative disparity, disparity gradient, and disparity curvature of surfaces defined by horizontal binocular disparity in random-dot stereograms. In experiment 1, thresholds for discriminating the depth of sinusoidal corrugations were very similar for different corrugation frequencies, despite large differences in disparity gradient and disparity curvature. Thus observers used a relative disparity cue in preference to a slant or curvature cue. Experiment 2 isolated the spatial derivatives of disparity by jittering the other available cues, using surfaces with square-wave, triangle-wave, and parabolic-wave profiles. Weber fractions were 4%-10% for relative disparity, 6%-12% for disparity gradient, and 15%-30% for disparity curvature. Experiment 3 confirmed this result for larger surfaces. The study supports the view that human stereoscopic vision aims to represent the local scene relative to the observer, at the expense of computing intrinsic properties of objects, such as curvature.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1996

Ideal observer for heading judgments.

Several aspects of the viewing situation affect the ability to determine heading from optical flow. These include the amount of depth variation and number of texture elements in the scene, the location and amount of the visual field stimulated, and the position of the focus of expansion within the stimulus. Without a quantification of the discrimination information provided by the stimuli presented to the observer, it is impossible to determine how much of an observed change in performance reflects the properties of neural mechanisms and strategies employed by the observer. To enable a better quantification, we developed an ideal observer for the discrimination of heading from random-dot flow fields. Internal noises of the ideal observer were set by the results of single-dot velocity discrimination experiments. We compared human and ideal observer performance in discriminating headings with different patterns of flow (e.g. radial vs laminar) presented on different parts of the retina. Efficiency--the ratio of ideal and human thresholds--was fairly constant for the various flow patterns and retinal eccentricities. This outcome indicates that most of the variation in human observers' ability to estimate heading from the flow patterns and retinal loci considered here is due to changes in the discrimination information provided by the stimulus after measurement by the visual system. In the discussion, we show how the ideal observer can be used to quantify the spatial distribution of heading discrimination information for any observer translation through any scene represented by dots.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1996

Spatio-temporal requirements for binocular correlation in stereopsis.

We measured sensitivity to binocular correlation in dynamic random-dot stereograms that defined moving sinusoidal gratings-in-depth. At a range of spatial frequencies and drift rates we established sensitivity by adding Gaussian distributed disparity noise to the modulation of disparity that defined a cyclopean grating, and finding the noise amplitude that rendered the grating just detectable. This permitted correlation thresholds to be measured at a range of suprathreshold disparity amplitudes. Spatial requirements for binocular correlation depend little on temporal frequency, and vice versa. This suggests that binocular correlation mechanisms can be characterized by independent spatial and temporal sensitivity functions. The temporal frequency function has a low pass characteristic. Sensitivity declines above about 1 c/sec, reaching its limit at 4-8 c/sec. The spatial characteristic depends greatly on the amplitude of disparity modulation, changing from band pass at low amplitude to low pass at high amplitude. The maximum resolvable spatial frequency is 4-6 c/deg, but declines sharply for relatively high amplitudes. The interaction between amplitude and spatial frequency cannot be explained by fixed high or low limits on detectable disparity gradients.

Depth Perception↗