PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8766072

[Problems in cochlear implant surgery].

Abstract

In cochlear implant surgery, major complications, requiring revision procedures, do not exceed 5% of cases reported. Less frequent are problems that call for specific technical solutions. In 44 multichannel implantations (out of 54 cases) adverse conditions occurred and were successfully resolved in 6 patients: 1) delayed wound breakdown (one case); 2) chronic otitis media (three cases); 3) cochlear obliteration (two cases). Problem 1 was managed with the excision of an ellipse of skin including the devitalized areas under local anesthesia. The electronic package was left untouched, and the freshly cutaneous edges were mobilized and layer-sutured. Problem 2 was solved through a two-stage procedure. The chronic ear was dealt with as usual (myringoplasty, tympanoplasty, revision of a radical mastoidectomy). In the second stage the cochleotomy and device implantation were carried out. Problem 3 is a major issue for the surgeon. Following the Lehnhardt technique we drilled along the basal cochlear turn using the sharp line between the yellowish otic bone and the white newly formed bone as a landmark, until a patent s.tympani was found at the ascending part of the 1st or at the beginning of the 2nd turn.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Trabalzini, G Babighian. 1996. [Problems in cochlear implant surgery].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8766072/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Vestibular stimulation by multichannel cochlear implants.

The recipient of a Nucleus 22 multichannel cochlear implant began to experience severe vestibular stimulation related to the implant. This patient's experience initiated a study with the objective of determining the frequency of implant-related vestibulo-ocular stimulation. Subjects consisted of 17 randomly selected patients who use cochlear implants. Included in the study were 14 Nucleus 22 and three Med-El Combi 40-devices. Stimulation of the implants was performed both by individual channel and with sound field broad-band 80-dB noise using the users' normal device settings. Eye movements were monitored with infrared videonystagmography. Only one subject, who used a Med-El Combi 40, showed a consistent and strong ocular response to cochlear stimulation but had no subjective symptoms. The authors conclude that vestibulo-ocular activation is possible with multichannel cochlear implants but is infrequent and may not be clinically significant.

Cochlear Implants