PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8766232

[Does the physician need religion?].

Abstract

The enormous progress in natural and physical sciences leads medicine to limits, namely limits of ethics, credibility and economy. The term 'religio' does not mean religion in the traditional sense, but stands for the norms guiding the physician's actions. Simultaneously, 'religio' searches for clues in fairy tales and myths that guide the physician, on his delicate way between feasibility and responsibility.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Rohr. 1996-07-16. [Does the physician need religion?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8766232/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗