PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8766843

[Statistical methodologic comments on epidemiologic work disability trends].

M Stallmann
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The term "epidemiological absenteeism trend"-especially as used in Germany-was defined by Wagner in 1977 and has since entered the sickness-absence discussion as an outcome indicator of medical rehabilitation. In its key concepts, the term refers to the fact that although there is a constant trend in absenteeism over time, individuals show changes in absenteeism from one measurement to the next. Evaluations of those individuals who have very high (or low) absence rates change to a higher degree than do those of individuals with mean scores on the absenteeism index; nevertheless, the summation of all deviations will be zero. In evaluating absence reduction due to rehabilitation, this fact must be considered. Because people who take part in medical rehabilitation show high absenteeism before they start its intervention, there will be--according to Wagner's absenteeism trend--a higher rate of reduction in sickness absence in the time following rehabilitation than there will be for people with medium scores. This paper investigates the hypothesis that the epidemiological absenteeism trend is identical with Galton's discovery--roughly 100 years before Wagner's definition--generally referred to as "reversion". Galton developed this term as the fundamental concept for regression and correlation. It can be shown that the absenteeism trend does not give a special description of sickness-absence but is rather the results of applying regression analysis. With the help of the statistical method of log linear modelling, a re-analysis of Wagner's data is performed in which the term epidemiological absenteeism trend is not necessary. In consequence, it is argued that this term should be abandoned or given a new meaning.

Explore related subjects

AbsenteeismData Interpretation, StatisticalPersons with DisabilitiesEpidemiologic MethodsGermanyHumansRegression AnalysisRehabilitation, VocationalEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Stallmann. 1996. [Statistical methodologic comments on epidemiologic work disability trends].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8766843/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Burden of migraine in the United States: disability and economic costs.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common disabling disease but its economic burden has not been adequately quantified. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the burden of migraine in the United States with respect to disability and economic costs. METHODS: The following data sources were used: published data, the Baltimore County Migraine Study, MEDSTAT's MarketScan medical claims data set, and statistics from the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Disability was expressed as bedridden days. Charges for migraine-related treatment were used as direct cost inputs. The human capital approach was used in the estimation of indirect costs. RESULTS: Migraineurs required 3.8 bed rest days for men and 5.6 days for women each year, resulting in a total of 112 million bedridden days. Migraine costs American employers about $13 billion a year because of missed workdays and impaired work function; close to $8 billion was directly due to missed workdays. Patients of both sexes aged 30 to 49 years incurred higher indirect costs compared with younger or older employed patients. Annual direct medical costs for migraine care were about $1 billion and about $100 was spent per diagnosed patient. Physician office visits accounted for about 60% of all costs; in contrast, emergency department visits contributed less than 1% of the direct costs. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of migraine predominantly falls on patients and their employers in the form of bedridden days and lost productivity. Various screening and treatment regimens should be evaluated to identify opportunities to reduce the disease burden.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1999

Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals: a randomized trial.

CONTEXT: Data are limited and conflicting regarding the effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of trivalent influenza vaccine in reducing infection, illness, and absence from work in young, healthy health care professionals. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blind, controlled trial over 3 consecutive years, from 1992-1993 to 1994-1995. SETTING: Two large teaching hospitals in Baltimore, Md. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred sixty-four hospital-based health care professionals without chronic medical problems were recruited; 49 participated for 2 seasons; 24 participated for 3 seasons. The mean age was 28.4 years, 75% were resident physicians, and 57% were women. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either an influenza vaccine or a control (meningococcal vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine, or placebo). Serum samples for antibody assays were collected at the time of vaccination, 1 month after vaccination, and at the end of the influenza season. Active weekly surveillance for illness was conducted during each influenza epidemic period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serologically defined influenza infection (4-fold increase in hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies), days of febrile respiratory illness, and days absent from work. RESULTS: We conducted 359 person-winters of serologic surveillance (99.4% follow-up) and 4746 person-weeks of illness surveillance (100% follow-up). Twenty-four(13.4%) of 179 control subjects and 3 (1.7%) of 180 influenza vaccine recipients had serologic evidence of influenza type A or B infection during the study period. Vaccine efficacy against serologically defined infection was 88% for influenza A (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%-97%; P=.001) and 89% for influenza B (95% CI, 14%-99%; P=.03). Among influenza vaccinees, cumulative days of reported febrile respiratory illness were 28.7 per 100 subjects compared with 40.6 per 100 subjects in controls (P=.57) and days of absence were 9.9 per 100 subjects vs 21.1 per 100 subjects in controls (P=.41). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccine is effective in preventing infection by influenza A and B in health care professionals and may reduce reported days of work absence and febrile respiratory illness. These data support a policy of annual influenza vaccination of health care professionals.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1999

Role of schools in the transmission of measles in rural Senegal: implications for measles control in developing countries.

Patterns of measles transmission at school and at home were studied in 1995 in a rural area of Senegal with a high level of vaccination coverage. Among 209 case children with a median age of 8 years, there were no deaths, although the case fatality ratio has previously been 6-7% in this area. Forty percent of the case children had been vaccinated against measles; the proportion of vaccinated children was higher among secondary cases (47%) than among index cases (33%) (prevalence ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.76). Vaccinated index cases may have been less infectious than unvaccinated index cases, since they produced fewer clinical cases among exposed children (relative risk = 0.55, 95% CI 0.29-1.04). The secondary attack rate was lower in the schools than in the homes (relative risk = 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.49). The school outbreaks were protracted, with 4-5 generations of cases being seen in the two larger schools. Vaccine efficacy was found to be 57% (95% CI -23 to 85) in the schools and 74% (95% CI 62-82) in the residential compounds. Measles infection resulted in a mean of 3.8 days of absenteeism per case, though this did not appear to have an impact on the children's grades. Among the index cases, 56% of children were probably infected by neighbors in the community, and 7% were probably infected at health centers, 13% outside the community, and 24% in one of the three schools which had outbreaks during the epidemic. However, most of the school-related cases occurred at the beginning and therefore contributed to the general propagation of the epidemic. To prevent school outbreaks, it may be necessary to require vaccination prior to school entry and to revaccinate children in individual schools upon detection of cases of measles. Multidose measles vaccination schedules will be necessary to control measles in developing countries.

Absenteeism↗