PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8768044

[Lymph node diagnosis with imaging methods. An overview with special reference to recent developments in the area of MR contrast media].

Abstract

The main problem in current lymph node imaging is the lack of reliable criteria for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant nodes, the main criterion being size. To reliably opacify all lymph nodes in the body, an intravenous contrast agent is therefore necessary. Two new contrast agents for MRI seem promising: lymphotropic iron oxides and Gadolinium DTPA-PGM. After intravenous administration these agents accumulate in phagocytic cells of normal lymph nodes but are excluded from nodes in which phagocytic activity is replaced. While iron oxides are already in clinical studies, GD-DTPA-PGM is in preclinical studies. Both agents seem to significantly improve the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes irrespective of size.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

U Mohr, R Weissleder. 1996. [Lymph node diagnosis with imaging methods. An overview with special reference to recent developments in the area of MR contrast media].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8768044/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Type, severity, frequency and management of adverse reactions associated with ultrasound contrast agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis are aimed at evaluating the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following administration of clinically approved ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in adults and children, to assess risks in patients with cardiovascular disease and in pregnancy, and to evaluate the effectiveness of emergency management of severe ADRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PRISMA 2020 systematic review was conducted searching PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality. Incidence estimates were pooled when feasible, stratified by age group, contrast agent, and administration route. RESULTS: Seventy-four studies encompassing >&#x2009;1 million adults and >&#x2009;36,000 children were included, contributing multiple analytic cohorts to the quantitative synthesis. Severe acute ADRs were extremely rare (6 and 16 cases per 100,000 in adults and children, respectively) and absent following endocavitary administration in children. Non-severe acute ADRs occurred in 11 and 8 cases per 10,000 adults and children, respectively. Delayed reactions were very rare (<&#x2009;1 case per million in adults). No significant safety differences emerged between UCA products. The incidence of ADRs in patients with cardiovascular disease was analogous to the general population. No ADRs were reported in pregnant women. Standard emergency management was effective in almost all serious cases, though rare fatalities occurred. CONCLUSION: UCAs show an excellent safety profile in adults and children, with very rare severe ADRs and few non-severe, typically self-limiting reactions. Strict adherence to recommended emergency management protocols mitigates the remaining risks, supporting safe use across a broad range of clinical indications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023432668. KEY POINTS: Question What is the incidence, type, and severity of acute and delayed ADRs associated with clinically approved UCAs across different patient populations? Findings Severe acute adverse reactions are very rare, and non-severe reactions are rare and self-limiting, with no significant safety differences between adults, children, or patients with cardiovascular disease. Clinical relevant UCAs show an excellent safety profile across populations. These findings support their safe clinical use as reliable alternatives to iodine-based and gadolinium-based contrast agents in routine diagnostic imaging.

Contrast Media

[Gastrografin for mechanical partial, small bowel obstruction due to adhesions].

The therapeutic effect of gastrografin is occasionally mentioned in the literature. However, this effect has not been objectively evaluated. We studied prospectively the effect of Gastrografin in cases of adhesive, simple, partial, small bowel obstruction (SBO) compared to conventional management. During 3 years, a total of 137 episodes of simple, partial SBO in 127 patients (10 recurrent episodes) were treated. The episodes were randomized into a control group (80 episodes), treated conventionally, and a trial group (77 episodes), which received in addition 100 ml of Gastrografin administered through the nasogastric tube. The two groups were well-matched with regard to age, gender, weight, medical and surgical background and duration of complaints before admission. Time to first stool and resolution of obstruction, complications, need for surgery, and hospital stay were noted. Mean time to first stool was significantly shorter in the trial group: 6.2 +/- 3.9 hours vs 23.5 +/- 12.7 (p < .0001). Mean hospital stay for unoperated patients was also shorter in the trial group: 2.7 +/- 2 days vs 5.5 +/- 2 days, (p < .0001). In addition, significantly fewer episodes in the trial group required operation, 10.4 vs 26.7% (p < 0.013). 1 patient in each group dies following operation. There were no Gastrografin-related complications and it was effective and safe for adhesive, partial, simple SBO. It significantly speeds resolution of obstruction, reduces the need for operation, and shortens convalescence.

Contrast Media