PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8773570

Optimization of immunofluorescence methods by quantitative image analysis.

D E Mosedale·J C Metcalfe·D J Grainger
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There is a growing trend towards the objective quantification of immunohistochemical staining. However, quantification has not been used previously to optimize the original published immunohistochemical methods. We present a quantitative method for analyzing immunofluorescence staining employing the Applied Imaging MAGISCAN image analysis system, which has then been used to optimize major aspects of the standard immunofluorescent staining protocols. The optimization process resulted in a method that increased specific staining up to fivefold over typical published protocols, with no increase in nonspecific staining. The method is extremely reproducible. For slides stained by a single experimenter in one batch on one day, the coefficient of variation between replicate means is 1.2%. The image analysis protocol gave a linear response with increasing antigen concentration, as determined by using purified antigen dried onto slides. The revisions to the standard protocol presented here can also be applied to nonquantitative staining. It will help users of immunofluorescence to maximize their staining and may enable the detection of previously undetected antigens.

Explore related subjects

ActinsAnimalsCarotid ArteriesFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryMicroscopy, FluorescenceRatsRats, WistarReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D E Mosedale, J C Metcalfe, D J Grainger. 1996. Optimization of immunofluorescence methods by quantitative image analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1177/44.9.8773570

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2009

Nap1-mediated actin remodeling is essential for mammalian myoblast fusion.

Myoblast fusion is crucial for the formation, growth, maintenance and regeneration of healthy skeletal muscle. Unfortunately, the molecular machinery, cell behaviors, and membrane and cytoskeletal remodeling events that govern fusion and myofiber formation remain poorly understood. Using time-lapse imaging approaches on mouse C2C12 myoblasts, we identify discrete and specific molecular events at myoblast membranes during fusion and myotube formation. These events include rearrangement of cell shape from fibroblast to spindle-like morphologies, changes in lamellipodial and filopodial extensions during different periods of differentiation, and changes in membrane alignment and organization during fusion. We find that actin-cytoskeleton remodeling is crucial for these events: pharmacological inhibition of F-actin polymerization leads to decreased lamellipodial and filopodial extensions and to reduced myoblast fusion. Additionally, shRNA-mediated inhibition of Nap1, a member of the WAVE actin-remodeling complex, results in accumulations of F-actin structures at the plasma membrane that are concomitant with a decrease in myoblast fusion. Our data highlight distinct and essential roles for actin cytoskeleton remodeling during mammalian myoblast fusion, provide a platform for cellular and molecular dissection of the fusion process, and suggest a functional conservation of Nap1-regulated actin-cytoskeleton remodeling during myoblast fusion between mammals and Drosophila.

Actins↗
PubMed1997

Profilin interacts with the Gly-Pro-Pro-Pro-Pro-Pro sequences of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP): implications for actin-based Listeria motility.

Intracellular actin-based motility of Listeria monocytogenes requires protein-protein interactions involving two different proline-rich sequences: first, the tightly bound bacterial surface protein ActA uses its multiple oligoproline registers [consensus sequence = FE(D)FPPPPTD(E)E(D)] to tether vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) to the bacterial surface; and second, VASP then deploys its own multiple GPPPPP (or GP5) registers to localize the actin-regulatory protein profilin to promote actin polymerization. We now report that fluorescence titration showed that GP5GP5GP5 peptide binds to profilin (KD of 84 microM), and the peptide weakly inhibits exchange of actin-bound nucleotide in the absence or presence of profilin. Microinjection of synthetic GPPPPP triplet into Listeria-infected PtK2 cells promptly arrested motility at an intracellular concentration of 10 microM. This inhibition was completely neutralized when equimolar concentrations of profilin and GP5GP5GP5 were simultaneously microinjected. Fluorescence studies with [His-133-Ser]-profilin, a site-directed mutant previously shown to be defective in binding poly-l-proline [Bjorkegren, C., Rozycki, M., Schutt, C. E., Lindberg, U., & Karlsson, R. (1993) FEBS Lett. 333, 123-126], exhibits little or no evidence of saturable GP5GP5GP5 binding. When an equimolar concentration of this [His-133-Ser]-profilin mutant was co-injected with GP5GP5GP5, the peptide's inhibitory action remained completely unaffected, indicating that GP5GP5GP5 binding to wild-type profilin represents a key step in actin-based pathogen motility. We also present a model that shows how the focal binding of VASP with its GPPPPP registers can greatly increase the local concentration of profilin and/or profilin-actin-ATP complex at the bacteria/rocket-tail interface.

Actins↗
PubMed1997

Fluorescence probing of yeast actin subdomain 3/4 hydrophobic loop 262-274. Actin-actin and actin-myosin interactions in actin filaments.

Residues 262-274 form a loop between subdomains 3 and 4 of actin. This loop may play an important role in actin filament formation and stabilization. To assess directly the behavior of this loop, we mutated Ser265 of yeast actin to cysteine (S265C) and created another mutant (S265C/C374A) by changing Cys374 of S265C actin to alanine. These changes allowed us to attach a pyrene maleimide stoichiometrically to either Cys374 or Cys265. These mutations had no detectable effects on the protease susceptibility, intrinsic ATPase activity, and thermal stability of labeled or unlabeled G-actin. The presence of the loop cysteine, either labeled or unlabeled, did not affect the actin-activated S1 ATPase activity or the in vitro motility of the actin. Both mutant actins, either labeled or unlabeled, nucleated filament formation considerably faster than wild-type (WT) actin, although the critical concentration was not affected. Whereas the fluorescence of the C-terminal (WT) probe increased during polymerization, that of the loop (S265C/C374A) probe decreased, and the fluorescence of the doubly labeled actin (S265C) was approximately 50% less than the sum of the fluorescence of the individual fluorophores. Quenching was also observed in copolymers of labeled WT and S265C/C374A actins. An excimer peak was present in the emission spectrum of labeled S265C F-actin and in the labeled S265C/C374A-WT actin copolymers. These results show that in the filaments, the C-terminal pyrene of a substantial fraction of monomers directly interacts with the loop pyrene of neighboring monomers, bringing the two cysteine sulfurs to within 18 A of one another. Finally, when bound to labeled S265C/C374A F-actin, myosin S1, but not tropomyosin, caused an increase in fluorescence of the loop probe. Both proteins had no effect on excimer fluorescence. These results help establish the orientation of monomers in F-actin and show that the binding of S1 to actin subdomains 1 and 2 affects the environment of the loop between subdomains 3 and 4.

Actins↗